The Prognostic Impact of Primary Tumor Site Differs According to the KRAS Mutational Status: A Study by the International Genetic Consortium for Colorectal Liver Metastasis

Georgios Antonios Margonis, Neda Amini, Stefan Buettner, Yuhree Kim, Jaeyun Wang, Nikolaos Andreatos, Doris Wagner, Kazunari Sasaki, Andrea Beer, Carsten Kamphues, Daisuke Morioka, Inger Marie Løes, Katsunori Imai, Jin He, Timothy M. Pawlik, Klaus Kaczirek, George Poultsides, Per Eystein Lønning, Richard Burkhart, Itaru EndoHideo Baba, Hans Joerg Mischinger, Federico N. Aucejo, Martin E. Kreis, Christopher L. Wolfgang, Matthew J. Weiss

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

29 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective:To examine the prognostic impact of tumor laterality in colon cancer liver metastases (CLM) after stratifying by Kirsten rat sarcoma 2 viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutational status.Background:Although some studies have demonstrated that patients with CLM from a right sided (RS) primary cancer fare worse, others have found equivocal outcomes of patients with CLM with RS versus left-sided (LS) primary tumors. Importantly, recent evidence from unresectable metastatic CRC suggests that tumor laterality impacts prognosis only in those with wild-type tumors.Methods:Patients with rectal or transverse colon tumors and those with unknown KRAS mutational status were excluded from analysis. The prognostic impact of RS versus LS primary CRC was determined after stratifying by KRAS mutational status.Results:277 patients had a RS (38.6%) and 441 (61.4%) had a LS tumor. Approximately one-third of tumors (28.1%) harbored KRAS mutations. In the entire cohort, RS was associated with worse 5-year overall survival (OS) compared with LS (39.4% vs 50.8%, P = 0.03) and remained significantly associated with worse OS in the multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.45, P = 0.04). In wild-type patients, a worse 5-year OS associated with a RS tumor was evident in univariable analysis (43.7% vs 55.5%, P = 0.02) and persisted in multivariable analysis (hazard ratio 1.49, P = 0.01). In contrast, among patients with KRAS mutated tumors, tumor laterality had no impact on 5-year OS, even in the univariable analysis (32.8% vs 34.0%, P = 0.38).Conclusions:This study demonstrated, for the first time, that the prognostic impact of primary tumor side differs according to KRAS mutational status. RS tumors were associated with worse survival only in patients with wild-type tumors.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1165-1172
Number of pages8
JournalAnnals of surgery
Volume273
Issue number6
DOIs
StatePublished - Jun 1 2021

Keywords

  • KRAS
  • primary tumor location
  • prognosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Prognostic Impact of Primary Tumor Site Differs According to the KRAS Mutational Status: A Study by the International Genetic Consortium for Colorectal Liver Metastasis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this