The PREVAIL Study: Primary Outcomes by Site and Extent of Baseline Disease for Enzalutamide-treated Men with Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer

Christopher P. Evans, Celestia S. Higano, Thomas Keane, Gerald Andriole, Fred Saad, Peter Iversen, Kurt Miller, Choung Soo Kim, Go Kimura, Andrew J. Armstrong, Cora N. Sternberg, Yohann Loriot, Johann de Bono, Sarah B. Noonberg, Hank Mansbach, Suman Bhattacharya, Frank Perabo, Tomasz M. Beer, Bertrand Tombal

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

78 Scopus citations

Abstract

Background Enzalutamide, an oral androgen receptor inhibitor, significantly improved overall survival (OS) and radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) versus placebo in the PREVAIL trial of men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer. Objective To assess the effects of enzalutamide versus placebo in patients from PREVAIL based on site and extent of baseline disease. Design, setting, and participants One thousand seven hundred and seventeen asymptomatic or minimally symptomatic patients were randomized to enzalutamide (n = 872) or placebo (n = 845). Subgroup analyses included nonvisceral (only bone and/or nodal; n = 1513), visceral (lung and/or liver; n = 204), low-volume bone disease (<4 bone metastases; n = 867), high-volume bone disease (≥4 bone metastases; n = 850), lymph node only disease (n = 195). Intervention Oral enzalutamide (160 mg) or placebo once daily while continuing androgen deprivation therapy. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Coprimary endpoints (rPFS, OS) were prospectively evaluated in nonvisceral and visceral subgroups. All other efficacy analyses were post hoc. Results and limitations Enzalutamide improved rPFS versus placebo in patients with nonvisceral disease (hazard ratio [HR], 0.18; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.14–0.22), visceral disease (HR, 0.28; 95% CI, 0.16–0.49), low- or high-volume bone disease (HR, 0.16; 95% CI, 0.11–0.22; HR, 0.22; 95% CI, 0.16–0.29, respectively), and lymph node only disease (HR, 0.09; 95% CI, 0.04–0.19). For OS, HRs favored enzalutamide (<1) across all disease subgroups, although 95% CI was >1 in patients with visceral disease (HR, 0.82; 95% CI, 0.55–1.23). Enzalutamide was well tolerated in patients with or without visceral disease. Conclusions Enzalutamide provided clinically significant benefits in men with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, with or without visceral disease, low- or high-volume bone disease, or lymph node only disease. Patient summary Patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer—including those with or without visceral disease or widespread bone disease—benefitted from enzalutamide, an active well-tolerated therapy.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)675-683
Number of pages9
JournalEuropean Urology
Volume70
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Oct 1 2016

Keywords

  • Androgen receptor
  • Castration-resistant prostatic cancer
  • Enzalutamide

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The PREVAIL Study: Primary Outcomes by Site and Extent of Baseline Disease for Enzalutamide-treated Men with Chemotherapy-naïve Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this