The Political Responsiveness of Violent Crime Prosecution

Ethan D. Boldt, Christina L. Boyd

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    10 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    Is a federal prosecutor’s decision whether to pursue violent crime charges political? While prosecutors frequently assert their decision-making independence, their selection and operational constraints suggest a very different story. We assess whether political factors related to the prosecution priorities of the president, Congress, and the local public affect federal prosecutors’ decisions to pursue or decline charges in violent crime matters. To empirically examine this, we utilize data from 89 U.S. Attorneys offices from 1996 to 2011. The results provide rich new insight into when and why federal prosecutors’ decisions to pursue or decline prosecutions are driven by the preferences of the president, Congress, and the local public. The findings also have important broader implications for the role of political factors in a U.S. criminal justice system believed by many to be in crisis.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)936-948
    Number of pages13
    JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
    Volume71
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Dec 1 2018

    Keywords

    • Congress
    • judiciary
    • president
    • principal-agent
    • prosecutors
    • violent crime

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The Political Responsiveness of Violent Crime Prosecution'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this