The pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) gene family, a tremendous resource for plant phylogenetic studies

Yao Wu Yuan, Chang Liu, Hannah E. Marx, Richard G. Olmstead

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

44 Scopus citations

Abstract

• Despite the paramount importance of nuclear gene data in plant phylogenetics, the search for candidate loci is believed to be challenging and time-consuming. Here we report that the pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) gene family, containing hundreds of members in plant genomes, holds tremendous potential as nuclear gene markers. • We compiled a list of 127 PPR loci that are all intronless and have a single orthologue in both rice (Oryza sativa) and Arabidopsis thaliana. The uncorrected p-distances were calculated for these loci between two Arabidopsis species and among three Poaceae genera. We also selected 13 loci to evaluate their phylogenetic utility in resolving relationships among six Poaceae genera and nine diploid Oryza species. • PPR genes have a rapid rate of evolution and can be best used at intergeneric and interspecific levels. Although with substantial amounts of missing data, almost all individual data sets from the 13 loci generate well-resolved gene trees. • With the unique combination of three characteristics (having a large number of loci with established orthology assessment, being intronless, and being rapidly evolving), the PPR genes have many advantages as phylogenetic markers (e.g. straightforward alignment, minimal effort in generating sequence data, and versatile utilities). We perceive that these loci will play an important role in plant phylogenetics.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)272-283
Number of pages12
JournalNew Phytologist
Volume182
Issue number1
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 2009

Keywords

  • Intronless
  • Nuclear gene loci
  • Pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) genes
  • Plant phylogenetics
  • Rapidly evolving

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The pentatricopeptide repeat (PPR) gene family, a tremendous resource for plant phylogenetic studies'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this