TY - JOUR
T1 - The neural basis of feedback-guided behavioral adjustment
AU - Sun, Sai
AU - Wang, Shuo
N1 - Funding Information:
We thank Ping Zhang for collecting some of the data, and Rongjun Yu and Paula Webster for valuable comments. This research was supported by the China Scholarship Council (to S.S.), and an NSF CAREER Award ( 1945230 ), West Virginia University (WVU) , WVU PSCoR Program , ORAU Ralph E. Powe Junior Faculty Enhancement Award , and the Dana Foundation (to S.W.). The funders had no role in study design, data collection, and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2020 Elsevier B.V.
PY - 2020/9/25
Y1 - 2020/9/25
N2 - Given feedback on the outcomes of our choices, humans can then make adjustments to future decisions. This is how we learn. However, how knowing the outcome of one's decisions influences behavioral changes, and especially the neural basis of those behavioral changes, still remains unclear. To investigate these questions, we employed a simple gambling task, in which participants chose between two alternative cards and received trial-by-trial feedback of their choices. In different sessions, we emphasized either utility (win or loss) or performance (whether the choice was correct [better than the alternative] or incorrect), making one of the two aspects more salient to participants. We found that trial-by-trial feedback and the saliency of the feedback modulated behavioral adjustments and subjective evaluations of the outcomes. With simultaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) recording, we found that the feedback-related negativity (FRN), P300, and late positive potential (LPP) served as the neural substrates for behavioral decision switching. Together, our findings reveal the neural basis of behavioral adjustment based on outcome evaluation and highlight the key role of feedback evaluation in future action selection and flexible adaptation.
AB - Given feedback on the outcomes of our choices, humans can then make adjustments to future decisions. This is how we learn. However, how knowing the outcome of one's decisions influences behavioral changes, and especially the neural basis of those behavioral changes, still remains unclear. To investigate these questions, we employed a simple gambling task, in which participants chose between two alternative cards and received trial-by-trial feedback of their choices. In different sessions, we emphasized either utility (win or loss) or performance (whether the choice was correct [better than the alternative] or incorrect), making one of the two aspects more salient to participants. We found that trial-by-trial feedback and the saliency of the feedback modulated behavioral adjustments and subjective evaluations of the outcomes. With simultaneous electroencephalogram (EEG) recording, we found that the feedback-related negativity (FRN), P300, and late positive potential (LPP) served as the neural substrates for behavioral decision switching. Together, our findings reveal the neural basis of behavioral adjustment based on outcome evaluation and highlight the key role of feedback evaluation in future action selection and flexible adaptation.
KW - Decision making
KW - Feedback-related negativity (FRN)
KW - Late positive potential (LPP)
KW - P300
KW - Saliency
KW - Theta-band power
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85088903073&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135243
DO - 10.1016/j.neulet.2020.135243
M3 - Article
C2 - 32726592
AN - SCOPUS:85088903073
VL - 736
JO - Neuroscience Letters
JF - Neuroscience Letters
SN - 0304-3940
M1 - 135243
ER -