TY - JOUR
T1 - The MFS versus the Trefftz method for the Laplace equation in 3D
AU - Lv, Hui
AU - Hao, Fang
AU - Wang, Yong
AU - Chen, C. S.
N1 - Funding Information:
Authors acknowledge the support of the Soft Science Project of Shanxi Province of China (Project No. 2016041029?5), the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11472184) and the National Youth Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 11401423).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 Elsevier Ltd
PY - 2017/10
Y1 - 2017/10
N2 - The method of fundamental solutions (MFS) and the Trefftz method are two powerful boundary meshless methods for solving boundary value problems governed by homogeneous partial differential equations. High accuracy can be obtained when we employ these two methods to solve equations with harmonic boundary conditions. However, dealing with equations with non-harmonic boundary conditions in irregular domains remains a challenge. Despite the long history of these two methods, each one has its disadvantages in numerical implementation. Recent advances in the Trefftz method using the multiple scale technique has made significant improvement in reducing the condition number. As a result, the Trefftz method has become more effective for solving challenging problems. Meanwhile, there has also been progress in selecting the source points in the MFS using the Leave-One-Out Cross Validation (LOOCV) method. In this paper, we propose a simple and yet effective approach to further improve the selection of source points of the MFS in 3D. Equipped with these new techniques, we compare these two methods for solving the Laplace equation with non-harmonic boundary conditions in complicated irregular domains in 3D. In this paper, we only consider the Trefftz method with cylindrical basis functions.
AB - The method of fundamental solutions (MFS) and the Trefftz method are two powerful boundary meshless methods for solving boundary value problems governed by homogeneous partial differential equations. High accuracy can be obtained when we employ these two methods to solve equations with harmonic boundary conditions. However, dealing with equations with non-harmonic boundary conditions in irregular domains remains a challenge. Despite the long history of these two methods, each one has its disadvantages in numerical implementation. Recent advances in the Trefftz method using the multiple scale technique has made significant improvement in reducing the condition number. As a result, the Trefftz method has become more effective for solving challenging problems. Meanwhile, there has also been progress in selecting the source points in the MFS using the Leave-One-Out Cross Validation (LOOCV) method. In this paper, we propose a simple and yet effective approach to further improve the selection of source points of the MFS in 3D. Equipped with these new techniques, we compare these two methods for solving the Laplace equation with non-harmonic boundary conditions in complicated irregular domains in 3D. In this paper, we only consider the Trefftz method with cylindrical basis functions.
KW - LOOCV
KW - Method of fundamental solutions
KW - Multiple scale technique
KW - Trefftz method
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85026738913&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.enganabound.2017.06.006
DO - 10.1016/j.enganabound.2017.06.006
M3 - Review article
AN - SCOPUS:85026738913
VL - 83
SP - 133
EP - 140
JO - Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
JF - Engineering Analysis with Boundary Elements
SN - 0955-7997
ER -