TY - JOUR
T1 - The Many Faces of Learning-Guided Cognitive Control
AU - Bugg, Julie M.
AU - Egner, Tobias
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 American Psychological Association
PY - 2021
Y1 - 2021
N2 - Cognitive control refers to processes that enable adaptive, goaldirected behavior. Once ascribed to smart agents that willfully biased behavior in a top-down fashion (Norman & Shallice, 1986), an emerging “learning perspective” embodies the view that associative learning and memory processes are central to control (for recent reviews, see Abrahamse et al., 2016; Braem & Egner, 2018; Chiu & Egner, 2019; Egner, 2014). The guiding question of this special issue is how people learn to adapt control in a context-sensitive manner (“control learning”). Broadly speaking, the hypothesis probed by the articles herein is that this occurs via learning about regularities in the (task) environment, which in turn guides the engagement of control. This can take place in the form of incremental learning of the contextual likelihood of control demands (e.g., the accumulating realization that the current block of trials seems to be of high difficulty), and/or by associating specific stimuli or “events” with specific control demands, which can subsequently be retrieved in response to those stimuli/events. However, depending on context, adaptive control and the processes of learning and memory can also be at odds with one another. The studies in this special issue tackle three key themes surrounding learning-control interactions.
AB - Cognitive control refers to processes that enable adaptive, goaldirected behavior. Once ascribed to smart agents that willfully biased behavior in a top-down fashion (Norman & Shallice, 1986), an emerging “learning perspective” embodies the view that associative learning and memory processes are central to control (for recent reviews, see Abrahamse et al., 2016; Braem & Egner, 2018; Chiu & Egner, 2019; Egner, 2014). The guiding question of this special issue is how people learn to adapt control in a context-sensitive manner (“control learning”). Broadly speaking, the hypothesis probed by the articles herein is that this occurs via learning about regularities in the (task) environment, which in turn guides the engagement of control. This can take place in the form of incremental learning of the contextual likelihood of control demands (e.g., the accumulating realization that the current block of trials seems to be of high difficulty), and/or by associating specific stimuli or “events” with specific control demands, which can subsequently be retrieved in response to those stimuli/events. However, depending on context, adaptive control and the processes of learning and memory can also be at odds with one another. The studies in this special issue tackle three key themes surrounding learning-control interactions.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85123459066
U2 - 10.1037/xlm0001075
DO - 10.1037/xlm0001075
M3 - Editorial
C2 - 35025594
AN - SCOPUS:85123459066
SN - 0278-7393
VL - 47
SP - 1547
EP - 1549
JO - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
JF - Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning Memory and Cognition
IS - 10
ER -