TY - JOUR
T1 - The lifetime economic burden of keratoconus
T2 - A decision analysis using a markov model
AU - Rebenitsch, Ronald L.
AU - Kymes, Steven M.
AU - Walline, Jeffrey J.
AU - Gordon, Mae O.
N1 - Copyright:
Copyright 2018 Elsevier B.V., All rights reserved.
PY - 2011/5
Y1 - 2011/5
N2 - Purpose To estimate the expected incremental lifetime cost of treatment of keratoconus compared to the expected cost of the treatment of myopia. Design Cost estimate from the patient's perspective using a Markov decision model. Methods We modeled a hypothetical cohort of people with clinically significant incident keratoconus as defined by the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. We included costs of clinic visits, fitting fees, contact lenses, surgical procedures, and complications. Survival curves of corneal transplants and associated complications were modeled using data from the 2007 Australian Graft Registry. Medical treatment regimens after surgery were defined by expert opinion. Results The expected value of the lifetime cost of the treatment of keratoconus over myopia was $25 168 with a standard deviation of $16 247 and a median of $17 596. The factors that most influenced the lifetime cost were the probability of initial corneal transplant and a subsequent regraft. The cost of routine care had relatively little influence on the lifetime cost of care. Conclusions The expected lifetime cost of treatment of keratoconus represents a significant cost to patients and payors. While the cost of routine care for keratoconus is not trivial, the primary factor influencing changes in the cost of care for keratoconus is the probability of corneal transplant. Combined with the significantly impaired vision-related quality of life and the relatively young onset of disease, the economic burden of the treatment of keratoconus represents a significant public health concern.
AB - Purpose To estimate the expected incremental lifetime cost of treatment of keratoconus compared to the expected cost of the treatment of myopia. Design Cost estimate from the patient's perspective using a Markov decision model. Methods We modeled a hypothetical cohort of people with clinically significant incident keratoconus as defined by the Collaborative Longitudinal Evaluation of Keratoconus (CLEK) Study. We included costs of clinic visits, fitting fees, contact lenses, surgical procedures, and complications. Survival curves of corneal transplants and associated complications were modeled using data from the 2007 Australian Graft Registry. Medical treatment regimens after surgery were defined by expert opinion. Results The expected value of the lifetime cost of the treatment of keratoconus over myopia was $25 168 with a standard deviation of $16 247 and a median of $17 596. The factors that most influenced the lifetime cost were the probability of initial corneal transplant and a subsequent regraft. The cost of routine care had relatively little influence on the lifetime cost of care. Conclusions The expected lifetime cost of treatment of keratoconus represents a significant cost to patients and payors. While the cost of routine care for keratoconus is not trivial, the primary factor influencing changes in the cost of care for keratoconus is the probability of corneal transplant. Combined with the significantly impaired vision-related quality of life and the relatively young onset of disease, the economic burden of the treatment of keratoconus represents a significant public health concern.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=79955152915&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.10.034
DO - 10.1016/j.ajo.2010.10.034
M3 - Article
C2 - 21310384
AN - SCOPUS:79955152915
SN - 0002-9394
VL - 151
SP - 768-773.e2
JO - American journal of ophthalmology
JF - American journal of ophthalmology
IS - 5
ER -