The legacy of apartheid: Racial differences in the legitimacy of democratic institutions and processes in the new South Africa

  • James L. Gibson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    27 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    This research investigates whether and to what degree all major racial/ethnic/linguistic groups in South Africa extend legitimacy to the key institutions of democratic governance. This question is important because most democratic analysts argue that subcultural pluralism is inimical to democracy. Based on a mass public survey, the author discovers that support for democracy in South Africa is not widespread; it varies considerably across the major racial/ethnic groups in the country; education contributes to the development of democratic values among whites but not among Africans, "Coloureds, " and those of Asian origin; and the strength of group identities and levels of psychological dogmatism are the strongest predictors of support for democratic institutions and processes. Despite the author's efforts to attribute racial differences to more theoretical processes, race, ceteris paribus, has much to do with how one feels about democracy. This legacy of the apartheid past thus continues to dog contemporary South Africa.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)772-800
    Number of pages29
    JournalComparative Political Studies
    Volume36
    Issue number7
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2003

    Keywords

    • Apartheid
    • Legacies of authoritarianism
    • South African political culture
    • Support for democratic institutions and processes

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The legacy of apartheid: Racial differences in the legitimacy of democratic institutions and processes in the new South Africa'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this