The ISSG-AO Complication Intervention Score, but Not Major/Minor Designation, is Correlated With Length of Stay Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery

Joseph B. Wick, Andrew Blandino, Justin S. Smith, Breton G. Line, Virginie Lafage, Renaud Lafage, Han Jo Kim, Peter G. Passias, Jeffrey L. Gum, Khaled M. Kebaish, Robert K. Eastlack, Alan Daniels, Gregory Mundis, Richard Hostin, Themistocles Protopsaltis, D. Kojo Hamilton, Michael P. Kelly, Munish Gupta, Robert A. Hart, Frank J. SchwabDouglas C. Burton, Christopher P. Ames, Lawrence G. Lenke, Christopher I. Shaffrey, Shay Bess, Eric Klineberg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Study Design: Retrospective review. Objectives: The International Spine Study Group-AO (ISSG-AO) Adult Spinal Deformity (ASD) Complication Classification System was developed to improve classification, reporting, and study of complications among patients undergoing ASD surgery. The ISSG-AO system classifies interventions to address complications by level of invasiveness: grade zero (none); grade 1, mild (e.g., medication change); grade 2, moderate (e.g., ICU admission); grade 3, severe (e.g., reoperation related to surgery of interest). To evaluate the efficacy of the ISSG-AO ASD Complication Classification System, we aimed to compare correlations between postoperative length of stay (LOS) and complication severity as classified by the ISSG-AO ASD and traditional major/minor complication classification systems. Methods: Patients age ≥18 in a multicenter ASD database who sustained in-hospital complications were identified. Complications were classified with the major/minor and ISSG-AO systems and correlated with LOS using an ensemble-based machine learning algorithm (conditional random forest) and a generalized linear mixed model. Results: 490 patients at 19 sites were included. 64.9% of complications were major, and 35.1% were minor. By ISSG-AO classification, 20.4%, 66.1%, 6.7%, and 6.7% were grades 0-3, respectively. ISSG-AO complication grading demonstrated significant correlation with LOS, whereas major/minor complication classification demonstrated inverse correlation with LOS. In conditional random forest analysis, ISSG-AO classification had the greatest relative importance when assessing correlations across multiple variables with LOS. Conclusions: The ISSG-AO system may help identify specific complications associated with prolonged LOS. Targeted interventions to avoid or reduce these complications may improve ASD surgical quality and resource utilization.

Original languageEnglish
JournalGlobal Spine Journal
DOIs
StateAccepted/In press - 2023

Keywords

  • adult spinal deformity
  • classification
  • complications
  • deformity
  • degenerative
  • grading
  • length of stay
  • lumbar
  • major
  • minor
  • neurologic
  • scoliosis
  • spine
  • thoracic

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The ISSG-AO Complication Intervention Score, but Not Major/Minor Designation, is Correlated With Length of Stay Following Adult Spinal Deformity Surgery'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this