The inflatable penile prosthesis, reoperation and patient satisfaction: A comparison of statistics obtained from patient record review with statistics obtained from intensive followup search

S. M. Apte, J. G. Gregory, M. H. Purcell

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

26 Scopus citations

Abstract

Of 179 patients who received the inflatable penile prosthesis 43% have required reoperation, 60% of which were performed for mechanical failure. An attempt to evaluate the adequacy of chart review in assessing current function and patient satisfaction was made by comparing reports obtained by chart review to those obtained by direct patient interview. Results showed that if chart review alone was used malfunction would have been underestimated by 13% and patient satisfaction overestimated by 21%. The importance of direct followup in evaluating patients with the inflatable penile prosthesis is demonstrated.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)894-895
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of Urology
Volume131
Issue number5
DOIs
StatePublished - 1984

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The inflatable penile prosthesis, reoperation and patient satisfaction: A comparison of statistics obtained from patient record review with statistics obtained from intensive followup search'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this