Abstract
Of 179 patients who received the inflatable penile prosthesis 43% have required reoperation, 60% of which were performed for mechanical failure. An attempt to evaluate the adequacy of chart review in assessing current function and patient satisfaction was made by comparing reports obtained by chart review to those obtained by direct patient interview. Results showed that if chart review alone was used malfunction would have been underestimated by 13% and patient satisfaction overestimated by 21%. The importance of direct followup in evaluating patients with the inflatable penile prosthesis is demonstrated.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 894-895 |
Number of pages | 2 |
Journal | Journal of Urology |
Volume | 131 |
Issue number | 5 |
DOIs | |
State | Published - 1984 |