TY - JOUR
T1 - The Impact of Needle Geometry on Tissue Damage and Anastomotic Leakage
T2 - A Combined Analysis of Human Skin and Porcine Cardiovascular Models
AU - Jeong, Daehee
AU - Badran, Saif
AU - Schanbacher, Joseph M.
AU - Potter, Christian T.
AU - Maloney, McKenzie E.
AU - Montilla, Richard D.
AU - Sacks, Justin
AU - Fudem, Gary
AU - Schanbacher, Carl F.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2025. Thieme. All rights reserved.
PY - 2025
Y1 - 2025
N2 - Background Surgical needles have evolved to optimize tissue approximation while minimizing tissue damage. Needle point geometry is a critical operative factor that impacts surgical dexterity. This study aims to compare the effects of taper point (TP) and reverse cutting (RC) needles on tissue damage and anastomotic bleeding risk across different tissue types and needle diameters. Methods Two experimental models were employed. The Tissue Damage Model pierced 10 abdominal and 10 cheek skin samples using TP and RC needles. Histologic impact on skin layers was analyzed. The Anastomosis Leakage Model measured fluid leakage after 30 porcine aortas were punctured by TP and RC needles of varying diameters in an ex vivo pulsatile flow system. Both experiments ensured controlled variables and consistent methodologies. Results In the Tissue Damage Model, RC needles caused twice as much dermal disruption in both abdominal and cheek skin as TP needles (p < 0.01). Abdominal skin exhibited twice the histological damage compared to facial skin, irrespective of needle geometry (p < 0.05). In the Anastomosis Leakage Model, RC needles caused 5.6-, 4.0-, and 8.7-fold more leakage than TP needles at small, medium, and large needle diameters, respectively (p < 0.002). Leakage from RC needles increased with needle diameter (p < 0.001). TP needles did not exhibit this effect. Conclusion RC needles caused significantly more dermal disruption compared to TP needles. Greater tissue damage was observed in abdominal skin than in facial skin. Additionally, RC needles led to progressively higher fluid leakage as needle diameter increased, while TP needles did not.
AB - Background Surgical needles have evolved to optimize tissue approximation while minimizing tissue damage. Needle point geometry is a critical operative factor that impacts surgical dexterity. This study aims to compare the effects of taper point (TP) and reverse cutting (RC) needles on tissue damage and anastomotic bleeding risk across different tissue types and needle diameters. Methods Two experimental models were employed. The Tissue Damage Model pierced 10 abdominal and 10 cheek skin samples using TP and RC needles. Histologic impact on skin layers was analyzed. The Anastomosis Leakage Model measured fluid leakage after 30 porcine aortas were punctured by TP and RC needles of varying diameters in an ex vivo pulsatile flow system. Both experiments ensured controlled variables and consistent methodologies. Results In the Tissue Damage Model, RC needles caused twice as much dermal disruption in both abdominal and cheek skin as TP needles (p < 0.01). Abdominal skin exhibited twice the histological damage compared to facial skin, irrespective of needle geometry (p < 0.05). In the Anastomosis Leakage Model, RC needles caused 5.6-, 4.0-, and 8.7-fold more leakage than TP needles at small, medium, and large needle diameters, respectively (p < 0.002). Leakage from RC needles increased with needle diameter (p < 0.001). TP needles did not exhibit this effect. Conclusion RC needles caused significantly more dermal disruption compared to TP needles. Greater tissue damage was observed in abdominal skin than in facial skin. Additionally, RC needles led to progressively higher fluid leakage as needle diameter increased, while TP needles did not.
KW - needle
KW - reverse cutting needle
KW - suture
KW - taper needle
KW - tissue damage
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/105023494782
U2 - 10.1055/a-2737-5529
DO - 10.1055/a-2737-5529
M3 - Article
C2 - 41314401
AN - SCOPUS:105023494782
SN - 0743-684X
JO - Journal of reconstructive microsurgery
JF - Journal of reconstructive microsurgery
ER -