The impact of massachusetts health care reform on access, quality, and costs of care for the already-insured

Karen E. Joynt, David C. Chan, Jie Zheng, E. John Orav, Ashish K. Jha

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

20 Scopus citations

Abstract

Objective To assess the impact of Massachusetts Health Reform (MHR) on access, quality, and costs of outpatient care for the already-insured. Data Sources/Study Setting Medicare data from before (2006) and after (2009) MHR implementation. Study Design We performed a retrospective difference-in-differences analysis of quantity of outpatient visits, proportion of outpatient quality metrics met, and costs of care for Medicare patients with ≥1 chronic disease in 2006 versus 2009. We used the remaining states in New England as controls. Data Collection/Extraction Methods We used existing Medicare claims data provided by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. Principal Findings MHR was not associated with a decrease in outpatient visits per year compared to controls (9.4 prereform to 9.6 postreform in MA vs. 9.4-9.5 in controls, p =.32). Quality of care in MA improved more than controls for hemoglobin A1c monitoring, mammography, and influenza vaccination, and similarly to controls for diabetic eye examination, colon cancer screening, and pneumococcal vaccination. Average costs for patients in Massachusetts increased from $9,389 to $10,668, versus $8,375 to $9,114 in control states (p <.001). Conclusions MHR was not associated with worsening in access or quality of outpatient care for the already-insured, and it had modest effects on costs. This has implications for other states expanding insurance coverage under the Affordable Care Act.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)599-613
Number of pages15
JournalHealth services research
Volume50
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1 2015

Keywords

  • Insurance expansion
  • costs
  • outpatient care
  • quality

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The impact of massachusetts health care reform on access, quality, and costs of care for the already-insured'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this