TY - JOUR
T1 - The impact of human papillomavirus vaccination on cervical cancer prevention efforts
AU - Massad, L. Stewart
AU - Einstein, Mark
AU - Myers, Evan
AU - Wheeler, Cosette M.
AU - Wentzensen, Nicolas
AU - Solomon, Diane
N1 - Funding Information:
The forum was supported by grants from Merck, GlaxoSmithKline, Hologic, Roche, and Qiagen directly to the Society for Gynecologic Oncologists (SGO). The authors received no funding from these commercial interests but did receive honoraria and had expenses paid by SGO, except that Dr. Solomon and Dr. Wentzensen did not receive honoraria or paid expenses.
Funding Information:
Dr Wheeler has received funding through the University of New Mexico from GlaxoSmith Kline and Merck to conduct HPV vaccine research and from Roche Molecular Systems to conduct HPV genotyping research.
Funding Information:
Dr. Myers has received research funding from Merck, and served as a consultant for Merck and GlaxoSmithKline.
PY - 2009/8
Y1 - 2009/8
N2 - Objectives: To review concepts, information, obstacles, and approaches to cervical cancer screening and prevention as vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 is adopted. Methods: Expert forum, conducted September 12-13, 2008, hosted by the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, including 56 experts in cervical cancer and titled Future Strategies of Cervical Cancer Prevention: What Do We Need to Do Now to Prepare? Results: The current approach to cervical cancer screening in the U.S. is limited by its opportunistic nature. If given to women before exposure, a vaccine against HPV 16,18 can decrease cervical cancer risk by up to 70%. The impact on abnormal cytology and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) will be less but still substantial. As the prevalence of high-grade CIN falls, fewer women with positive screening tests will have truly preinvasive disease. To minimize harm from false positive tests in women who are at low risk for cancer because of early vaccination, later initiation of and longer intervals between screenings are ideal. However, the vaccine is less effective when administered after first intercourse, and delivering and documenting HPV vaccination to girls at optimal ages may prove difficult. Conclusions: Until population-based data on the performance of cytology, HPV testing, and alternate screening or triage interventions become available, modifying current screening guidelines is premature. Current recommendations to initiate screening as late as age 21 and to screen less often than annually are appropriate for young women known to have been vaccinated before first intercourse.
AB - Objectives: To review concepts, information, obstacles, and approaches to cervical cancer screening and prevention as vaccination against human papillomavirus (HPV) types 16 and 18 is adopted. Methods: Expert forum, conducted September 12-13, 2008, hosted by the Society of Gynecologic Oncologists, including 56 experts in cervical cancer and titled Future Strategies of Cervical Cancer Prevention: What Do We Need to Do Now to Prepare? Results: The current approach to cervical cancer screening in the U.S. is limited by its opportunistic nature. If given to women before exposure, a vaccine against HPV 16,18 can decrease cervical cancer risk by up to 70%. The impact on abnormal cytology and cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) will be less but still substantial. As the prevalence of high-grade CIN falls, fewer women with positive screening tests will have truly preinvasive disease. To minimize harm from false positive tests in women who are at low risk for cancer because of early vaccination, later initiation of and longer intervals between screenings are ideal. However, the vaccine is less effective when administered after first intercourse, and delivering and documenting HPV vaccination to girls at optimal ages may prove difficult. Conclusions: Until population-based data on the performance of cytology, HPV testing, and alternate screening or triage interventions become available, modifying current screening guidelines is premature. Current recommendations to initiate screening as late as age 21 and to screen less often than annually are appropriate for young women known to have been vaccinated before first intercourse.
KW - Cervical cancer prevention
KW - HPV epidemiology
KW - HPV vaccine
KW - Human papillomavirus (HPV)
KW - Test accuracy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=67549124660&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.04.005
DO - 10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.04.005
M3 - Review article
C2 - 19410282
AN - SCOPUS:67549124660
SN - 0090-8258
VL - 114
SP - 360
EP - 364
JO - Gynecologic Oncology
JF - Gynecologic Oncology
IS - 2
ER -