The harms of promoting the lab leak hypothesis for SARS-CoV-2 origins without evidence

James Alwine, Felicia Goodrum, Bruce Banfield, David Bloom, William J. Britt, Andrew J. Broadbent, Samuel K. Campos, Arturo Casadevall, Gary C. Chan, Anna R. Cliffe, Terence Dermody, Paul Duprex, Lynn W. Enquist, Klaus Frueh, Adam P. Geballe, Marta Gaglia, Stephen Goldstein, Alexander L. Greninger, Gigi Kwick Gronvall, Jae U. JungJeremy P. Kamil, Seema Lakdawala, Shan Lu Liu, Micah Luftig, John P. Moore, Anne Moscona, Benjamin W. Neuman, Janko Nikolich, Christine O'Connor, Andrew Pekosz, Sallie Permar, Julie Pfeiffer, John Purdy, Angela Rasmussen, Bert Semler, Gregory A. Smith, David A. Stein, Koenraad Van Doorslaer, Sandra K. Weller, Sean P.J. Whelan, Andrew Yurochko

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Science is humanity’s best insurance against threats from nature, but it is a fragile enterprise that must be nourished and protected. The preponderance of scientific evidence indicates a natural origin for SARS-CoV-2. Yet, the theory that SARS-CoV-2 was engineered in and escaped from a lab dominates media attention, even in the absence of strong evidence. We discuss how the resulting anti-science movement puts the research community, scientific research, and pandemic preparedness at risk.

Original languageEnglish
JournalJournal of virology
Volume98
Issue number9
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2024

Keywords

  • anti-science
  • COVID-19
  • lab leak
  • origin
  • pandemic
  • SARS-CoV-2
  • science advocacy
  • science policy
  • spillover
  • zoonosis

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The harms of promoting the lab leak hypothesis for SARS-CoV-2 origins without evidence'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this