The haecceity theory and perspectival limitation

  • Jonathan L. Kvanvig

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Scopus citations

Abstract

Impressive work has been done in recent years in attempting to understand how self-awareness is related to other sorts of awareness. One theory of this relation is what I shall call the haecceity theory. In spite of its many accomplishments, I shall argue that the haecceity theory is flawed beyond hope. This defect alone would be cause for alarm, for the haecceity theory has its followers. However, much more than the haecceity theory is at stake; rather an entire (and dominant) way of thinking about awareness and self-awareness must be abandoned. To begin to clarify these cursory remarks, I turn first to the haecceity theory itself.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)295-305
Number of pages11
JournalAustralasian Journal of Philosophy
Volume67
Issue number3
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 1989

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The haecceity theory and perspectival limitation'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this