TY - JOUR
T1 - The haecceity theory and perspectival limitation
AU - Kvanvig, Jonathan L.
PY - 1989/9
Y1 - 1989/9
N2 - Impressive work has been done in recent years in attempting to understand how self-awareness is related to other sorts of awareness. One theory of this relation is what I shall call the haecceity theory. In spite of its many accomplishments, I shall argue that the haecceity theory is flawed beyond hope. This defect alone would be cause for alarm, for the haecceity theory has its followers. However, much more than the haecceity theory is at stake; rather an entire (and dominant) way of thinking about awareness and self-awareness must be abandoned. To begin to clarify these cursory remarks, I turn first to the haecceity theory itself.
AB - Impressive work has been done in recent years in attempting to understand how self-awareness is related to other sorts of awareness. One theory of this relation is what I shall call the haecceity theory. In spite of its many accomplishments, I shall argue that the haecceity theory is flawed beyond hope. This defect alone would be cause for alarm, for the haecceity theory has its followers. However, much more than the haecceity theory is at stake; rather an entire (and dominant) way of thinking about awareness and self-awareness must be abandoned. To begin to clarify these cursory remarks, I turn first to the haecceity theory itself.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/84928847432
U2 - 10.1080/00048408912350141
DO - 10.1080/00048408912350141
M3 - Article
AN - SCOPUS:84928847432
SN - 0004-8402
VL - 67
SP - 295
EP - 305
JO - Australasian Journal of Philosophy
JF - Australasian Journal of Philosophy
IS - 3
ER -