TY - JOUR
T1 - The geriatric distal femur fracture
T2 - nail, plate or both?
AU - Wilson, Jenna L.
AU - Squires, Mathieu
AU - McHugh, Michael
AU - Ahn, Jaimo
AU - Perdue, Aaron
AU - Hake, Mark
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022, The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag France SAS, part of Springer Nature.
PY - 2023/7
Y1 - 2023/7
N2 - Surgical fixation of distal femur fractures in geriatric patients is an evolving topic. Unlike hip fractures, treatment strategies for distal femur fractures are ill-defined and lack substantive high-quality evidence. With an increasing incidence and an association with significant morbidity and mortality, it is essential to understand existing treatment options and their supporting evidence. Current fixation methods include the use of either retrograde intramedullary nails, or plate and screw constructs. Due to the variability in fracture patterns, the unique anatomy of the distal femur, and the presence or absence or pre-existing implants, decision-making as to which method to use can be challenging. Recent literature has sought to describe the advantages and disadvantages of each, however, there is currently no consensus on a standard of care, and little randomized evidence is available that directly compares intramedullary nails with plating. Future randomized studies comparing intramedullary nails with plating constructs are necessary in order to develop a standard of care based on injury characteristics.
AB - Surgical fixation of distal femur fractures in geriatric patients is an evolving topic. Unlike hip fractures, treatment strategies for distal femur fractures are ill-defined and lack substantive high-quality evidence. With an increasing incidence and an association with significant morbidity and mortality, it is essential to understand existing treatment options and their supporting evidence. Current fixation methods include the use of either retrograde intramedullary nails, or plate and screw constructs. Due to the variability in fracture patterns, the unique anatomy of the distal femur, and the presence or absence or pre-existing implants, decision-making as to which method to use can be challenging. Recent literature has sought to describe the advantages and disadvantages of each, however, there is currently no consensus on a standard of care, and little randomized evidence is available that directly compares intramedullary nails with plating. Future randomized studies comparing intramedullary nails with plating constructs are necessary in order to develop a standard of care based on injury characteristics.
KW - Distal femur
KW - Fracture
KW - Geriatric
KW - Intramedullary nail
KW - Locking plate
KW - Periprosthetic
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85161794643&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00590-022-03337-5
DO - 10.1007/s00590-022-03337-5
M3 - Article
C2 - 35895117
AN - SCOPUS:85161794643
SN - 1633-8065
VL - 33
SP - 1485
EP - 1493
JO - European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
JF - European Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology
IS - 5
ER -