TY - JOUR
T1 - The functional internal rotation scale
T2 - a novel shoulder arthroplasty outcome measure
AU - Aleem, Alexander W.
AU - Chamberlain, Aaron M.
AU - Keener, Jay D.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 The Author(s)
PY - 2020/3
Y1 - 2020/3
N2 - Background: Shoulder arthroplasty, especially reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), continues to increase in volume. Limitations in internal rotation can be challenging following RSA. Current patient-reported outcome measures are limited in assessing a patient's functional internal rotation following shoulder arthroplasty. To address this limitation, a questionnaire was developed. Methods: A single-center prospective comparative cohort study was performed to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. A pilot group of patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up following shoulder arthroplasty was asked to complete the questionnaire. Reliability testing was performed using Cronbach's alpha test. Additionally, individual questions and total questionnaire scores were compared between patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and RSA. Results: The questionnaire showed high reliability with all questions. A group of 23 anatomic TSA and 20 RSA patients were compared. RSA patients scored significantly lower on the questionnaire (35.2 out of 50 vs. 43.9, P =.001). Conclusion: The questionnaire can be used in conjunction with other patient-reported outcome measures to help surgeons better assess patients' results following shoulder arthroplasty. The initial findings from our internal reliability study found that RSA patients had significantly lower scores and higher variability in internal rotation function vs. patients with TSA. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical importance of this questionnaire.
AB - Background: Shoulder arthroplasty, especially reverse shoulder arthroplasty (RSA), continues to increase in volume. Limitations in internal rotation can be challenging following RSA. Current patient-reported outcome measures are limited in assessing a patient's functional internal rotation following shoulder arthroplasty. To address this limitation, a questionnaire was developed. Methods: A single-center prospective comparative cohort study was performed to determine the reliability of the questionnaire. A pilot group of patients who had at least 1 year of follow-up following shoulder arthroplasty was asked to complete the questionnaire. Reliability testing was performed using Cronbach's alpha test. Additionally, individual questions and total questionnaire scores were compared between patients who underwent anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty (TSA) and RSA. Results: The questionnaire showed high reliability with all questions. A group of 23 anatomic TSA and 20 RSA patients were compared. RSA patients scored significantly lower on the questionnaire (35.2 out of 50 vs. 43.9, P =.001). Conclusion: The questionnaire can be used in conjunction with other patient-reported outcome measures to help surgeons better assess patients' results following shoulder arthroplasty. The initial findings from our internal reliability study found that RSA patients had significantly lower scores and higher variability in internal rotation function vs. patients with TSA. Further studies are needed to determine the clinical importance of this questionnaire.
KW - Basic Science Study
KW - Development/Validation of Outcome Instrument
KW - Shoulder arthroplasty
KW - functional shoulder outcomes
KW - internal rotation
KW - patient-reported outcomes
KW - reverse shoulder arthroplasty
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85103332974&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jses.2019.10.002
DO - 10.1016/j.jses.2019.10.002
M3 - Article
C2 - 32544941
AN - SCOPUS:85103332974
SN - 2666-6383
VL - 4
SP - 202
EP - 206
JO - JSES International
JF - JSES International
IS - 1
ER -