TY - JOUR
T1 - The foundation for the microbiology laboratory’s essential role in diagnostic stewardship
T2 - an ASM Laboratory Practices Subcommittee report
AU - Dumm, Rebekah E.
AU - Marlowe, Elizabeth M.
AU - Patterson, Logan
AU - Larkin, Paige M.K.
AU - She, Rosemary C.
AU - Filkins, Laura M.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2024 American Society for Microbiology. All rights reserved.
PY - 2024/10
Y1 - 2024/10
N2 - Diagnostic stewardship (DxS) has gained traction in recent years as a cross-disciplinary method to improve the quality of patient care while appropriately managing resources within the healthcare system. Clinical microbiology laboratorians have been highly engaged in DxS efforts to guide best practices with conventional microbiology tests and more recently with molecular infectious disease diagnostics. Laboratories can experience resistance to their role in DxS, especially when the clinical benefits, motivations for interventions, and underlying regulatory requirements are not clearly conveyed to stakeholders. Clinical laboratories must not only ensure ethical practices but also meet obligatory requirements to steward tests responsibly. In this review, we aim to support clinical microbiology laboratorians by providing the background and resources that demonstrate the laboratory’s essential role in DxS. The heart of this review is to collate regulatory and accreditation requirements that, in essence, mandate DxS practices as a long-standing, core element of high-quality laboratory testing to deliver the best possible patient care. While examples of the clinical impact of DxS are plentiful in the literature, here, we focus on the operational and regulatory justification for the laboratory’s role in stewardship activities.
AB - Diagnostic stewardship (DxS) has gained traction in recent years as a cross-disciplinary method to improve the quality of patient care while appropriately managing resources within the healthcare system. Clinical microbiology laboratorians have been highly engaged in DxS efforts to guide best practices with conventional microbiology tests and more recently with molecular infectious disease diagnostics. Laboratories can experience resistance to their role in DxS, especially when the clinical benefits, motivations for interventions, and underlying regulatory requirements are not clearly conveyed to stakeholders. Clinical laboratories must not only ensure ethical practices but also meet obligatory requirements to steward tests responsibly. In this review, we aim to support clinical microbiology laboratorians by providing the background and resources that demonstrate the laboratory’s essential role in DxS. The heart of this review is to collate regulatory and accreditation requirements that, in essence, mandate DxS practices as a long-standing, core element of high-quality laboratory testing to deliver the best possible patient care. While examples of the clinical impact of DxS are plentiful in the literature, here, we focus on the operational and regulatory justification for the laboratory’s role in stewardship activities.
KW - diagnostic stewardship
KW - infectious disease diagnostics
KW - laboratory accreditation
KW - regulatory compliance
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85206597717&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1128/jcm.00960-24
DO - 10.1128/jcm.00960-24
M3 - Review article
C2 - 39345225
AN - SCOPUS:85206597717
SN - 0095-1137
VL - 62
JO - Journal of clinical microbiology
JF - Journal of clinical microbiology
IS - 10
M1 - e00960-24
ER -