The Fate of the Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty

Robert L. Barrack, Ajay Aggarwal, R. Stephen J. Burnett, John C. Clohisy, Elie Ghanem, Peter Sharkey, Javad Parvizi

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

57 Scopus citations

Abstract

Of a consecutive series of 692 revision total knees at 3 centers, intraoperative cultures were unexpectedly found to be positive in 41 cases (5.9%). Of the 41, 29 (71%) cases had a single positive intraoperative culture and were determined to be a probable false positive based on absence of any other evidence of infection, of which 5 were treated with extended course of intravenous antibiotics after hospital discharge and the remaining 24 received no further treatment. None of these 24 patients manifested any sign of infection at follow-up, averaging 46 months (range, 24-74 months). Twelve patients were determined to have probable type 1 periprosthetic infection, 11 of which were treated with a course of antibiotics. Two of these patients became reinfected within a year. A single positive intraoperative culture after revision total knee arthroplasty does not mandate further treatment in the absence of any other signs of infection.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)94-99
Number of pages6
JournalJournal of Arthroplasty
Volume22
Issue number6 SUPPL.
DOIs
StatePublished - Sep 2007

Keywords

  • TKA
  • aseptic
  • infection
  • knee
  • positive intraoperative culture
  • revision total knee arthroplasty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Fate of the Unexpected Positive Intraoperative Cultures After Revision Total Knee Arthroplasty'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this