TY - JOUR
T1 - The faculty-to-faculty mentorship experience
T2 - A survey on challenges and recommendations for improvements
AU - Sarabipour, Sarvenaz
AU - Niemi, Natalie M.
AU - Burgess, Steven J.
AU - Smith, Christopher T.
AU - Bisson Filho, Alexandre W.
AU - Ibrahim, Ahmed
AU - Clark, Kelly
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Authors.
PY - 2023/12/13
Y1 - 2023/12/13
N2 - Faculty at research institutions play a central role in advancing knowledge and careers, as well as promoting the well-being of students and colleagues in research environments. Mentorship from experienced peers has been touted as critical for enabling these myriad roles to allow faculty development, career progression, and satisfaction. However, there is little information available on who supports faculty and best ways to structure a faculty mentorship programme for early- and mid-career academics. In the interest of advocating for increased and enhanced faculty mentoring and mentoring programmes, we surveyed faculty around the world to gather data on whether and how they receive mentoring. We received responses from 457 early- and mid-career faculty and found that a substantial portion of respondents either reported having no mentor or a lack of a formal mentoring scheme. Qualitative responses on the quality of mentorship revealed that the most common complaints regarding mentorship included lack of mentor availability, unsatisfactory commitment to mentorship, and non-specific or non-actionable advice. On these suggestions, we identify a need for training for faculty mentors as well as strategies for individual mentors, departments, and institutions for funding and design of more intentional and supportive mentorship programmes for early- and mid-career faculty.
AB - Faculty at research institutions play a central role in advancing knowledge and careers, as well as promoting the well-being of students and colleagues in research environments. Mentorship from experienced peers has been touted as critical for enabling these myriad roles to allow faculty development, career progression, and satisfaction. However, there is little information available on who supports faculty and best ways to structure a faculty mentorship programme for early- and mid-career academics. In the interest of advocating for increased and enhanced faculty mentoring and mentoring programmes, we surveyed faculty around the world to gather data on whether and how they receive mentoring. We received responses from 457 early- and mid-career faculty and found that a substantial portion of respondents either reported having no mentor or a lack of a formal mentoring scheme. Qualitative responses on the quality of mentorship revealed that the most common complaints regarding mentorship included lack of mentor availability, unsatisfactory commitment to mentorship, and non-specific or non-actionable advice. On these suggestions, we identify a need for training for faculty mentors as well as strategies for individual mentors, departments, and institutions for funding and design of more intentional and supportive mentorship programmes for early- and mid-career faculty.
KW - early careers
KW - faculty development
KW - mentoring
KW - mentorship programmes
KW - peer mentoring
KW - research culture
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85179646744
U2 - 10.1098/rspb.2023.0983
DO - 10.1098/rspb.2023.0983
M3 - Article
C2 - 38087923
AN - SCOPUS:85179646744
SN - 0962-8452
VL - 290
JO - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
JF - Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
IS - 2013
M1 - 20230983
ER -