TY - JOUR
T1 - The efficacy of 95-Hz topical vibration in pain reduction for trigger finger injection
T2 - A placebo-controlled, prospective, randomized trial
AU - Park, Kevin W.
AU - Boyer, Martin I.
AU - Calfee, Ryan P.
AU - Goldfarb, Charles A.
AU - Osei, Daniel A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2014 ASSH Published by Elsevier, Inc. All rights reserved.
PY - 2014/11/1
Y1 - 2014/11/1
N2 - Methods A total of 90 trigger finger injections were randomized to 1 of 3 cohorts. With the injection, patients received no vibration (control group), ultrasound vibration (sham control group), or vibration (experimental group). We used a commercial handheld massaging device to provide a vibratory stimulus for the experimental group. We obtained visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores before and after injection to assess anticipated pain and actual pain experienced.Results Anticipated pain and actual pain did not differ significantly among groups. Anticipated VAS pain scores were 45, 48, and 50 and actual VAS pain scores were 56, 56, and 63 for the vibration, control, and sham control groups, respectively. When normalized using anchoring VAS pain scores for "stubbing a toe" or "paper cut," no between-group differences remained in injection pain scores.Conclusions Concomitant vibratory stimulation does not reduce pain experienced during corticosteroid injections for trigger finger. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic I.Purpose To determine whether vibratory stimulation would decrease pain experienced by patients during corticosteroid injection for trigger finger.
AB - Methods A total of 90 trigger finger injections were randomized to 1 of 3 cohorts. With the injection, patients received no vibration (control group), ultrasound vibration (sham control group), or vibration (experimental group). We used a commercial handheld massaging device to provide a vibratory stimulus for the experimental group. We obtained visual analog scale (VAS) pain scores before and after injection to assess anticipated pain and actual pain experienced.Results Anticipated pain and actual pain did not differ significantly among groups. Anticipated VAS pain scores were 45, 48, and 50 and actual VAS pain scores were 56, 56, and 63 for the vibration, control, and sham control groups, respectively. When normalized using anchoring VAS pain scores for "stubbing a toe" or "paper cut," no between-group differences remained in injection pain scores.Conclusions Concomitant vibratory stimulation does not reduce pain experienced during corticosteroid injections for trigger finger. Type of study/level of evidence Therapeutic I.Purpose To determine whether vibratory stimulation would decrease pain experienced by patients during corticosteroid injection for trigger finger.
KW - Injection
KW - pain
KW - steroid
KW - trigger finger
KW - vibration anesthesia
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84908272149&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.047
DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2014.07.047
M3 - Article
C2 - 25218139
AN - SCOPUS:84908272149
SN - 0363-5023
VL - 39
SP - 2203
EP - 2207
JO - Journal of Hand Surgery
JF - Journal of Hand Surgery
IS - 11
ER -