The effects of judicial campaign activity on the legitimacy of courts: A survey-based experiment

James L. Gibson, Jeffrey A. Gottfried, Michael X.Delli Carpini, Kathleen Hall Jamieson

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    42 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The purpose of this article is to investigate the consequences of judicial campaign activity for the perceived legitimacy of the Pennsylvania judiciary. The authors find that politicized campaign ads do detract from court support, although they find practically no difference between traditional campaign ads (e.g., presenting endorsements from groups) and strong attack ads. But this finding must be understood within the context of the 2007 Pennsylvania election increasing court support for all respondents, even those exposed to the most politicized ad content. Being exposed to politicized ads seems to retard the benefits of elections but does not eliminate them.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)545-558
    Number of pages14
    JournalPolitical Research Quarterly
    Volume64
    Issue number3
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Sep 2011

    Keywords

    • attack ads
    • campaigning
    • judicial elections
    • judicial legitimacy
    • politicized campaigns

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'The effects of judicial campaign activity on the legitimacy of courts: A survey-based experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this