TY - JOUR
T1 - The Effect of Price on Surgeons’ Choice of Implants
T2 - A Randomized Controlled Survey
AU - and the
AU - Science of Variation Group
AU - Science of Variation Group
AU - Wasterlain, Amy S.
AU - Melamed, Eitan
AU - Karia, Raj
AU - Capo, John T.
AU - Bello, Ricardo
AU - Adams, Julie
AU - Vochteloo, A. J.H.
AU - Powell, Andrew John
AU - Marcus, Alexander
AU - Andreas, Platz
AU - Miller, Anna N.
AU - Berner, A. B.Arne
AU - Altintas, Burak
AU - Sears, Benjamin W.
AU - Calfee, Ryan P.
AU - Ekholm, Carl
AU - Fernandes, C. H.
AU - Porcellini, Giuseppe
AU - Jones, Clifford
AU - Moreno-Serrano, Constanza L.
AU - Manke, Chad
AU - Crist, Brett D.
AU - Haverkamp, Daniel
AU - Hanel, Doug
AU - Merchant, Milind
AU - Rikli, Daniel A.
AU - Shafi, Mohamed
AU - Patiño, Juan M.
AU - Duncan, Scott F.
AU - Ballas, Efsthathios G.
AU - Harvey, Edward
AU - Walbeehm, E. T.
AU - Schumer, Evan D.
AU - Evans, Peter J.
AU - Suarez, Fabio
AU - Lopez-Gonzalez, Francisco
AU - Seibert, Franz Josef
AU - DeSilva, Gregory
AU - Bayne, Grant J.
AU - Guitton, T. G.
AU - Nancollas, Michael
AU - Lane, Lewis B.
AU - Westly, Stephen K.
AU - Villamizar, Harold Alonso
AU - Pountos, Ippokratis
AU - Hofmeister, Eric
AU - Biert, Jan
AU - Goslings, J. Carel
AU - Bishop, Julius
AU - Gillespie, James A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2017 American Society for Surgery of the Hand
PY - 2017/8
Y1 - 2017/8
N2 - Purpose Surgical costs are under scrutiny and surgeons are being held increasingly responsible for cost containment. In some instances, implants are the largest component of total procedure cost, yet previous studies reveal that surgeons’ knowledge of implant prices is poor. Our study aims to (1) understand drivers behind implant selection and (2) assess whether educating surgeons about implant costs affects implant selection. Methods We surveyed 226 orthopedic surgeons across 6 continents. The survey presented 8 clinical cases of upper extremity fractures with history, radiographs, and implant options. Surgeons were randomized to receive either a version with each implant's average selling price (“price-aware” group), or a version without prices (“price-naïve” group). Surgeons selected a surgical implant and ranked factors affecting implant choice. Descriptive statistics and univariate, multivariable, and subgroup analyses were performed. Results For cases offering implants within the same class (eg, volar locking plates), price-awareness reduced implant cost by 9% to 11%. When offered different models of distal radius volar locking plates, 25% of price-naïve surgeons selected the most expensive plate compared with only 7% of price-aware surgeons. For cases offering different classes of implants (eg, plate vs external fixator), there was no difference in implant choice between price-aware and price-naïve surgeons. Familiarity with the implant was the most common reason for choosing an implant in both groups (35% vs 46%). Price-aware surgeons were more likely to rank cost as a factor (29% vs 21%). Conclusions Price awareness significantly influences surgeons’ choice of a specific model within the same implant class. Merely including prices with a list of implants leads surgeons to select less expensive implants. This implies that an untapped opportunity exists to reduce surgical expenditures simply by enhancing surgeons’ cost awareness. Type of study/level of evidence Economic/Decision Analyses I.
AB - Purpose Surgical costs are under scrutiny and surgeons are being held increasingly responsible for cost containment. In some instances, implants are the largest component of total procedure cost, yet previous studies reveal that surgeons’ knowledge of implant prices is poor. Our study aims to (1) understand drivers behind implant selection and (2) assess whether educating surgeons about implant costs affects implant selection. Methods We surveyed 226 orthopedic surgeons across 6 continents. The survey presented 8 clinical cases of upper extremity fractures with history, radiographs, and implant options. Surgeons were randomized to receive either a version with each implant's average selling price (“price-aware” group), or a version without prices (“price-naïve” group). Surgeons selected a surgical implant and ranked factors affecting implant choice. Descriptive statistics and univariate, multivariable, and subgroup analyses were performed. Results For cases offering implants within the same class (eg, volar locking plates), price-awareness reduced implant cost by 9% to 11%. When offered different models of distal radius volar locking plates, 25% of price-naïve surgeons selected the most expensive plate compared with only 7% of price-aware surgeons. For cases offering different classes of implants (eg, plate vs external fixator), there was no difference in implant choice between price-aware and price-naïve surgeons. Familiarity with the implant was the most common reason for choosing an implant in both groups (35% vs 46%). Price-aware surgeons were more likely to rank cost as a factor (29% vs 21%). Conclusions Price awareness significantly influences surgeons’ choice of a specific model within the same implant class. Merely including prices with a list of implants leads surgeons to select less expensive implants. This implies that an untapped opportunity exists to reduce surgical expenditures simply by enhancing surgeons’ cost awareness. Type of study/level of evidence Economic/Decision Analyses I.
KW - Cost
KW - implant
KW - price
KW - surgeon
KW - survey
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85020393640&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.005
DO - 10.1016/j.jhsa.2017.05.005
M3 - Article
C2 - 28606437
AN - SCOPUS:85020393640
SN - 0363-5023
VL - 42
SP - 593-601.e6
JO - Journal of Hand Surgery
JF - Journal of Hand Surgery
IS - 8
ER -