TY - JOUR
T1 - The effect of mesh reinforcement of a stapled transection line on the rate of pancreatic occlusion failure after distal pancreatectomy
T2 - Review of a single institution's experience
AU - Johnston, Fabian Mc
AU - Cavataio, Antonino
AU - Strasberg, Steven M.
AU - Hamilton, Nicholas A.
AU - Simon, Peter O.
AU - Trinkaus, Kathryn
AU - Doyle, M. B.Majella
AU - Mathews, Brent D.
AU - Porembka, Matthew R.
AU - Linehan, David C.
AU - Hawkins, William G.
PY - 2009
Y1 - 2009
N2 - Background: Pancreatic occlusion failure (POF) after distal pancreatectomy remains a common source of morbidity. Here, we review our experience with distal pancreatectomy and attempt to identify factors which influence POF rates. Patients and Methods: One hundred sixty-nine distal pancreatectomies were performed between 2002 and 2007. Review of the computerized medical records and physician office records was performed for all patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors which might influence the incidence of POF. The data set was analysed for factors which might influence the pancreatic occlusion rate. Analysis included patient and disease characteristics including: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, consistency of the pancreas and history of pancreatitis, as well as intra-operative variables including: surgeon, absorbable mesh reinforcement and operative approach. Results: POF was the most common peri-operative complication. POF was identified in 32 out of 169 patients (19%). Transection technique (hand sewn, stapled, stapled with mesh) and procedure complexity were factors associated with differences in POF rates by both univariate and multivariate analyses. POF was identified in 7 out of 70 patients (10%) when an absorbable mesh was utilized, and 25 of 99 patients (25%) when mesh was not utilized (P < 0.02). Discussion: These data suggest that a randomized controlled trial will be required to determine if mesh reinforcement reduces the rate and severity of POF after distal pancreatectomy.
AB - Background: Pancreatic occlusion failure (POF) after distal pancreatectomy remains a common source of morbidity. Here, we review our experience with distal pancreatectomy and attempt to identify factors which influence POF rates. Patients and Methods: One hundred sixty-nine distal pancreatectomies were performed between 2002 and 2007. Review of the computerized medical records and physician office records was performed for all patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine factors which might influence the incidence of POF. The data set was analysed for factors which might influence the pancreatic occlusion rate. Analysis included patient and disease characteristics including: age, gender, body mass index (BMI), diagnosis, consistency of the pancreas and history of pancreatitis, as well as intra-operative variables including: surgeon, absorbable mesh reinforcement and operative approach. Results: POF was the most common peri-operative complication. POF was identified in 32 out of 169 patients (19%). Transection technique (hand sewn, stapled, stapled with mesh) and procedure complexity were factors associated with differences in POF rates by both univariate and multivariate analyses. POF was identified in 7 out of 70 patients (10%) when an absorbable mesh was utilized, and 25 of 99 patients (25%) when mesh was not utilized (P < 0.02). Discussion: These data suggest that a randomized controlled trial will be required to determine if mesh reinforcement reduces the rate and severity of POF after distal pancreatectomy.
KW - Distal pancreatectomy
KW - Mesh reinforcement
KW - Pancreatic fistula
KW - Pancreatic leak
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=65749088066&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2008.00001.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2008.00001.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 19590620
AN - SCOPUS:65749088066
SN - 1365-182X
VL - 11
SP - 25
EP - 31
JO - HPB
JF - HPB
IS - 1
ER -