The diagnostic value of upper gastrointestinal radiography

John D. Goodson, John W. Lehmann, Graham A. Colditz, Susan Atamian, Deborah Hall, Donna Peltier-Saxe, James M. Richter

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

4 Scopus citations

Abstract

We reviewed the indications for and results of 788 consecutive upper gastrointestinal radiographs (UGIs) performed for ambulatory patients. Sixty-three percent of tests were ordered for the evaluation of abdominal pain, dyspepsia, or esophageal reflux. Of these tests, only 4.8% yielded results of major clinical importance to patient management. The yield for patients >50 years of age was greater than for patients <50, 6.9 versus 3.0% (p = 0.04). There was a significant increase in yield with increasing age (chi trend = 11.6, p < 0.001). Among patients with an indication of esophageal reflux alone (n = 62), there were no patients younger than age 60 with a test result that would significantly affect therapy or outcome. Among patients evaluated for fecal occult blood or weight loss (n = 120), 11.7% of tests ordered showed a finding of major clinical importance. In this group, the yield was higher in those ≥50 years of age than in those <50, 14.7 versus 6.7%, (p = 0.2). These results indicate that UGIs ordered to evaluate pain or symptoms of esophageal reflux in the absence of bleeding or weight loss rarely yield results that significantly influence therapy. Such patients may be best served by an initial trial of empiric therapy or some other test. The UGI has greatest value when indications for it include bleeding or weight loss.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)140-144
Number of pages5
JournalJournal of Clinical Gastroenterology
Volume12
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Apr 1990

Keywords

  • Abdominal pain
  • Diagnostic test evaluation
  • Dyspepsia
  • Upper gastrointestinal radiography

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The diagnostic value of upper gastrointestinal radiography'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this