TY - JOUR
T1 - The Clinical Cell-Cycle Risk (CCR) Score Is Associated With Metastasis After Radiation Therapy and Provides Guidance on When to Forgo Combined Androgen Deprivation Therapy With Dose-Escalated Radiation
AU - Tward, Jonathan
AU - Lenz, Lauren
AU - Flake, Darl D.
AU - Rajamani, Saradha
AU - Yonover, Paul
AU - Olsson, Carl
AU - Kapoor, Deepak A.
AU - Mantz, Constantine
AU - Liauw, Stanley L.
AU - Antic, Tatjana
AU - Fabrizio, Michael
AU - Salzstein, Daniel
AU - Shore, Neal
AU - Albertson, Dan
AU - Henderson, Jonathan
AU - Lee, Steve P.
AU - Gay, Hiram A.
AU - Michalski, Jeff
AU - Hung, Arthur
AU - Raben, David
AU - Garraway, Isla
AU - Lewis, Michael S.
AU - Nguyen, Paul L.
AU - Marshall, David T.
AU - Brawer, Michael K.
AU - Stone, Steven
AU - Cohen, Todd
N1 - Funding Information:
This work has been financially supported by Myriad Genetics, Inc.
Funding Information:
This work has been financially supported by Myriad Genetics, Inc. Disclosures: L.L., D.D.F., S.R., S.S., M.K.B., and T.C. were employed by and had stock options in Myriad Genetics, Inc, during the study. J.T. reported receiving grants and personal fees from Myriad Genetics, Inc, during the conduct of the study, personal fees from Blue Earth Diagnostics, Boston Scientific, Merck, and Janssen outside the submitted work, and grants and personal fees from Bayer outside the submitted work. P.L.N. reported receiving grants and personal fees from Astellas, Bayer, and Janssen and personal fees from COTA, Ferring, Augmenix, Dendreon, Blue Earth Diagnostics, Boston Scientific, and Myovant outside the submitted work. D.R. is currently employed by Genentech outside of the submitted work. J.H. reported receiving research funding and being a paid consultant for Myriad Genetics, Inc. D.T.M. reported receiving grants from Myriad Genetics, Inc, during the conduct of the study and grants and other from Isoray Medical, Inc, outside the submitted work. N.S. reported receiving personal fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Astellas, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boston Scientific, Clovis Oncology, Dendreon, Exact Imaging, FerGene, Foundation Medicine, GConcology, Invitae, Janssen, MDXHealth, Merck, Myovant, Myriad Genetics, Inc, Nymox, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, Tolmar, Sesen Bio, Propella, and Guardant Health outside the submitted work. P.Y. reported receiving personal speaker fees from Astellas, Pfizer, and Boston Scientific, and reported receiving personal speaker and consulting fees from MDxHealth. All other authors have nothing to disclose.
Publisher Copyright:
© 2021 The Author(s)
PY - 2022/5/1
Y1 - 2022/5/1
N2 - Purpose: The clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score, which combines the University of California, San Francisco's Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) and the cell cycle progression (CCP) molecular score, has been validated to be prognostic of disease progression for men with prostate cancer. This study evaluated the ability of the CCR score to prognosticate the risk of metastasis in men receiving dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods and Materials: This retrospective, multi-institutional cohort study included men with localized National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk prostate cancer (N = 741). Patients were treated with dose-escalated RT with or without ADT. The primary outcome was time to metastasis. Results: The CCR score prognosticated metastasis with a hazard ratio (HR) per unit score of 2.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71-2.89; P < .001). The CCR score better prognosticated metastasis than NCCN risk group (CCR, P < .001; NCCN, P = .46), CAPRA score (CCR, P = .002; CAPRA, P = .59), or CCP score (CCR, P < .001; CCP, P = .59) alone. In bivariable analyses, CCR score remained highly prognostic when accounting for ADT versus no ADT (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.61-2.96; P < .001), ADT duration as a continuous variable (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.59-2.79; P < .001), or ADT given at or below the recommended duration for each NCCN risk group (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.69-2.86; P < .001). Men with CCR scores below or above the multimodality threshold (CCR score, 2.112) had a 10-year risk of metastasis of 3.7% and 21.24%, respectively. Men with below-threshold scores receiving RT alone had a 10-year risk of metastasis of 3.7%, and for men receiving RT plus ADT, the 10-year risk of metastasis was also 3.7%. Conclusions: The CCR score accurately and precisely prognosticates metastasis and adds clinically actionable information relative to guideline-recommended therapies based on NCCN risk in men undergoing dose-escalated RT with or without ADT. For men with scores below the multimodality threshold, adding ADT may not significantly reduce their 10-year risk of metastasis.
AB - Purpose: The clinical cell-cycle risk (CCR) score, which combines the University of California, San Francisco's Cancer of the Prostate Risk Assessment (CAPRA) and the cell cycle progression (CCP) molecular score, has been validated to be prognostic of disease progression for men with prostate cancer. This study evaluated the ability of the CCR score to prognosticate the risk of metastasis in men receiving dose-escalated radiation therapy (RT) with or without androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Methods and Materials: This retrospective, multi-institutional cohort study included men with localized National Comprehensive Cancer Network (NCCN) intermediate-, high-, and very high-risk prostate cancer (N = 741). Patients were treated with dose-escalated RT with or without ADT. The primary outcome was time to metastasis. Results: The CCR score prognosticated metastasis with a hazard ratio (HR) per unit score of 2.22 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.71-2.89; P < .001). The CCR score better prognosticated metastasis than NCCN risk group (CCR, P < .001; NCCN, P = .46), CAPRA score (CCR, P = .002; CAPRA, P = .59), or CCP score (CCR, P < .001; CCP, P = .59) alone. In bivariable analyses, CCR score remained highly prognostic when accounting for ADT versus no ADT (HR, 2.18; 95% CI, 1.61-2.96; P < .001), ADT duration as a continuous variable (HR, 2.11; 95% CI, 1.59-2.79; P < .001), or ADT given at or below the recommended duration for each NCCN risk group (HR, 2.19; 95% CI, 1.69-2.86; P < .001). Men with CCR scores below or above the multimodality threshold (CCR score, 2.112) had a 10-year risk of metastasis of 3.7% and 21.24%, respectively. Men with below-threshold scores receiving RT alone had a 10-year risk of metastasis of 3.7%, and for men receiving RT plus ADT, the 10-year risk of metastasis was also 3.7%. Conclusions: The CCR score accurately and precisely prognosticates metastasis and adds clinically actionable information relative to guideline-recommended therapies based on NCCN risk in men undergoing dose-escalated RT with or without ADT. For men with scores below the multimodality threshold, adding ADT may not significantly reduce their 10-year risk of metastasis.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85118883844&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.034
DO - 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2021.09.034
M3 - Article
C2 - 34610388
AN - SCOPUS:85118883844
SN - 0360-3016
VL - 113
SP - 66
EP - 76
JO - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
JF - International Journal of Radiation Oncology Biology Physics
IS - 1
ER -