TY - JOUR
T1 - The challenges of collaboration for academic and community partners in a research partnership
T2 - Points to consider
AU - Ross, Lainie Friedman
AU - Loup, Allan
AU - Nelson, Robert M.
AU - Botkin, Jeffrey R.
AU - Kost, Rhonda
AU - Smith, George R.
AU - Gehlert, Sarah
PY - 2010/3
Y1 - 2010/3
N2 - The philosophical underpinning of Community-Engaged Research (CEnR) entails a collaborative partnership between academic researchers and the community. The Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) model is the partnership model most widely discussed in the CEnR literature and is the primary model we draw upon in this discussion of the collaboration between academic researchers and the community. In CPBR, the goal is for community partners to have equal authority and responsibility with the academic research team, and that the partners engage in respectful negotiation both before the research begins and throughout the research process to ensure that the concerns, interests, and needs of each party are addressed. The negotiation of a fair, successful, and enduring partnership requires transparency and understanding of the different assets, skills and expertise that each party brings to the project. Delineating the expectations of both parties and documenting the terms of agreement in a memorandum of understanding or similar document may be very useful. This document is structured to provide a "points-to-consider" roadmap for academic and community research partners to establish and maintain a research partnership at each stage of the research process.
AB - The philosophical underpinning of Community-Engaged Research (CEnR) entails a collaborative partnership between academic researchers and the community. The Community-Based Participatory Research (CBPR) model is the partnership model most widely discussed in the CEnR literature and is the primary model we draw upon in this discussion of the collaboration between academic researchers and the community. In CPBR, the goal is for community partners to have equal authority and responsibility with the academic research team, and that the partners engage in respectful negotiation both before the research begins and throughout the research process to ensure that the concerns, interests, and needs of each party are addressed. The negotiation of a fair, successful, and enduring partnership requires transparency and understanding of the different assets, skills and expertise that each party brings to the project. Delineating the expectations of both parties and documenting the terms of agreement in a memorandum of understanding or similar document may be very useful. This document is structured to provide a "points-to-consider" roadmap for academic and community research partners to establish and maintain a research partnership at each stage of the research process.
KW - Community
KW - Community-Engaged Research
KW - Community-academic partnerships
KW - Community-based organizations
KW - Communitybased participatory research
KW - Data dissemination
KW - Memorandum of understanding
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/77949842996
U2 - 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.19
DO - 10.1525/jer.2010.5.1.19
M3 - Article
C2 - 20235861
AN - SCOPUS:77949842996
SN - 1556-2646
VL - 5
SP - 19
EP - 31
JO - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
JF - Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics
IS - 1
ER -