The Bizarreness Effect: It's Not Surprising, It's Complex

Mark A. McDaniel, Gilles O. Einstein, Edward L. DeLosh, Cindi P. May, Paul Brady

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

111 Scopus citations

Abstract

Higher recall of bizarre images relative to common images (the bizarreness effect) is consistently found when bizarreness is varied as a within-subject (mixed-list) variable. In Experiment 1, mixed lists, rather than the smaller number of bizarre sentences typically used in such lists, determined the occurrence of the bizarreness effect. Contrary to predictions from expectation-violation theory, Experiments 2 and 3 showed that manipulations designed to augment or attenuate surprise reactions to bizarre sentences had little impact on the bizarreness effect. Experiments 4 and 5 indicated that mixing affected the degree to which participants differentially encoded order information for bizarre and common items. A new account of the bizarreness effect is presented that combines considerations of distinctiveness with the differential use of order information across bizarre and common items.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)422-435
Number of pages14
JournalJournal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition
Volume21
Issue number2
DOIs
StatePublished - Mar 1995

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'The Bizarreness Effect: It's Not Surprising, It's Complex'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this