Abstract
After describing a newly assembled dataset consisting of almost 9,000 local appropriations made by the U.S. Congress between 1789 and 1882, we test competing accounts of the politics surrounding them before offering a more nuanced, historically contingent view of the emergence of the pork barrel. We demonstrate that for most of this historical period - despite contemporary accusations of crass electoral motives - the pattern of appropriations is largely inconsistent with accounts of distributive politics grounded in a logic of legislative credit-claiming. Instead, support for appropriations in the House mapped cleanly onto the partisan/ideological structure of Congress for most of this period, and only in the 1870s produced the universalistic coalitions commonly associated with pork-barrel spending. We trace this shift to two historical factors: the emergence of a solid Democratic South, and growth in the fraction of appropriations funding recurrent expenditures on extant projects rather than new starts.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 564-579 |
| Number of pages | 16 |
| Journal | American Political Science Review |
| Volume | 112 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Aug 1 2018 |
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'The birth of pork: Local appropriations in america's first century'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver