TY - JOUR
T1 - The association of fetal acidemia with adverse neonatal outcomes at time of scheduled cesarean delivery
AU - Bligard, Katherine H.
AU - Cameo, Tamara
AU - McCallum, Kaitlin N.
AU - Rubin, Alexandra
AU - Rimsza, Rebecca R.
AU - Cahill, Alison G.
AU - Palanisamy, Arvind
AU - Odibo, Anthony O.
AU - Raghuraman, Nandini
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 Elsevier Inc.
PY - 2022/8
Y1 - 2022/8
N2 - Background: Fetal acidemia at the time of a scheduled cesarean delivery is generally unexpected. In the setting of reassuring preoperative monitoring, the duration of fetal acidemia in this scenario is presumably brief. The neonatal sequelae and risks associated with brief fetal acidemia in this setting are unknown. Objective: We aimed to assess whether fetal acidemia at the time of a scheduled prelabor cesarean delivery is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton, term, nonanomalous, liveborn neonates delivered by scheduled cesarean delivery that was performed under regional anesthesia from 2004 to 2014 at a single tertiary care center with a universal umbilical cord gas policy. Neonates born to laboring gravidas and those whose cesarean delivery was performed for nonreassuring fetal status were excluded. All included patients had reassuring preoperative fetal monitoring. The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome that included neonatal death, encephalopathy, therapeutic hypothermia, seizures, intubation, and respiratory distress. This outcome was compared between patients with and those without fetal acidemia (umbilical artery pH <7.2). A multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. Cases of fetal acidemia were further characterized as respiratory, metabolic, or mixed acidemia based on additional umbilical cord gas values. Secondary analyses examining the association between the type of acidemia and neonatal outcomes were also performed. Results: Of 2081 neonates delivered via scheduled cesarean delivery, 252 (12.1%) had fetal acidemia at the time of delivery. Acidemia was more common in breech neonates and in neonates born to gravidas with obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus. Compared with fetuses with normal umbilical artery pH, those with fetal acidemia were at a significantly increased risk for adverse neonatal outcome (adjusted relative risk, 2.95; 95% confidence interval, 2.03–4.12). This increased risk was similar regardless of the type of acidemia. Conclusion: Even a brief period of mild acidemia is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes at the time of a scheduled cesarean delivery despite reassuring preoperative monitoring. Addressing modifiable intraoperative factors that may contribute to fetal acidemia at the time of a scheduled cesarean delivery, such as maternal hypotension and prolonged operative time, is an important priority to potentially decrease neonatal morbidity in full-term gestations.
AB - Background: Fetal acidemia at the time of a scheduled cesarean delivery is generally unexpected. In the setting of reassuring preoperative monitoring, the duration of fetal acidemia in this scenario is presumably brief. The neonatal sequelae and risks associated with brief fetal acidemia in this setting are unknown. Objective: We aimed to assess whether fetal acidemia at the time of a scheduled prelabor cesarean delivery is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes. Study Design: This was a retrospective cohort study of singleton, term, nonanomalous, liveborn neonates delivered by scheduled cesarean delivery that was performed under regional anesthesia from 2004 to 2014 at a single tertiary care center with a universal umbilical cord gas policy. Neonates born to laboring gravidas and those whose cesarean delivery was performed for nonreassuring fetal status were excluded. All included patients had reassuring preoperative fetal monitoring. The primary outcome was a composite adverse neonatal outcome that included neonatal death, encephalopathy, therapeutic hypothermia, seizures, intubation, and respiratory distress. This outcome was compared between patients with and those without fetal acidemia (umbilical artery pH <7.2). A multivariable logistic regression was used to adjust for confounders. Cases of fetal acidemia were further characterized as respiratory, metabolic, or mixed acidemia based on additional umbilical cord gas values. Secondary analyses examining the association between the type of acidemia and neonatal outcomes were also performed. Results: Of 2081 neonates delivered via scheduled cesarean delivery, 252 (12.1%) had fetal acidemia at the time of delivery. Acidemia was more common in breech neonates and in neonates born to gravidas with obesity and gestational diabetes mellitus. Compared with fetuses with normal umbilical artery pH, those with fetal acidemia were at a significantly increased risk for adverse neonatal outcome (adjusted relative risk, 2.95; 95% confidence interval, 2.03–4.12). This increased risk was similar regardless of the type of acidemia. Conclusion: Even a brief period of mild acidemia is associated with adverse neonatal outcomes at the time of a scheduled cesarean delivery despite reassuring preoperative monitoring. Addressing modifiable intraoperative factors that may contribute to fetal acidemia at the time of a scheduled cesarean delivery, such as maternal hypotension and prolonged operative time, is an important priority to potentially decrease neonatal morbidity in full-term gestations.
KW - cesarean delivery
KW - metabolic acidemia
KW - mild acidemia
KW - neonatal death
KW - respiratory acidemia
KW - respiratory distress
KW - umbilical artery pH
KW - umbilical cord analysis
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85130348724&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.037
DO - 10.1016/j.ajog.2022.04.037
M3 - Article
C2 - 35489441
AN - SCOPUS:85130348724
SN - 0002-9378
VL - 227
SP - 265.e1-265.e8
JO - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
JF - American journal of obstetrics and gynecology
IS - 2
ER -