TY - JOUR
T1 - The assessment of clinically significant differences in treating spinal deformity using the SRS questionnaire
T2 - What is the threshold of change that is meaningful to patients?
AU - Berven, Sigurd
AU - Baron, Matthew
AU - Deviren, Vedat
AU - Glassman, Steven
AU - Bridwell, Keith
AU - Verma, Kushagra
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2019 International Society for the Advancement of Spine Surgery.
PY - 2019
Y1 - 2019
N2 - Background: The measurement of health-related quality of life is important in spinal deformity surgery. The Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire has allowed disease-specific research in this area, and determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is as important as it is elusive. We seek to further refine our estimations of clinically perceived improvements by the patient. Methods: We used an anchor-based approach for each domain of the SRS questionnaire to compare changes at 1 year after treatment. We set the MCID as the upper 95% boundary of the "no change" group bordering the "improvement" arm, where the patients may start to perceive their own change toward the better. We compared this with the mean change. Results: The threshold value for the MCID was 0.54 for the pain domain, 0.31 for function, 0.62 for self-image, and 0.5 for mental health. The mean changes in our group's pain and self-image exceeded their MCID. Conclusions: Compared with our previous work, we further attempted to refine our assessment of the MCID in spinal deformity. Pain continues to show clinically significant improvement, and self-image also demonstrated mean improvement over its estimated MCID. Level of Evidence: 2 Clinical Relevance: This result in self-image is an important addition to the MCID literature, given its lack of consistency in previous work.
AB - Background: The measurement of health-related quality of life is important in spinal deformity surgery. The Scoliosis Research Society questionnaire has allowed disease-specific research in this area, and determining the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) is as important as it is elusive. We seek to further refine our estimations of clinically perceived improvements by the patient. Methods: We used an anchor-based approach for each domain of the SRS questionnaire to compare changes at 1 year after treatment. We set the MCID as the upper 95% boundary of the "no change" group bordering the "improvement" arm, where the patients may start to perceive their own change toward the better. We compared this with the mean change. Results: The threshold value for the MCID was 0.54 for the pain domain, 0.31 for function, 0.62 for self-image, and 0.5 for mental health. The mean changes in our group's pain and self-image exceeded their MCID. Conclusions: Compared with our previous work, we further attempted to refine our assessment of the MCID in spinal deformity. Pain continues to show clinically significant improvement, and self-image also demonstrated mean improvement over its estimated MCID. Level of Evidence: 2 Clinical Relevance: This result in self-image is an important addition to the MCID literature, given its lack of consistency in previous work.
KW - MCID
KW - SRS-22R
KW - adult deformity
KW - outcomes
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85066050347&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.14444/6020
DO - 10.14444/6020
M3 - Article
C2 - 31131214
AN - SCOPUS:85066050347
SN - 2211-4599
VL - 13
SP - 153
EP - 157
JO - International Journal of Spine Surgery
JF - International Journal of Spine Surgery
IS - 2
ER -