TY - JOUR
T1 - The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia
T2 - Multidisciplinary and Open to All
AU - AGREE Dementia
AU - Rosen, Allyson C.
AU - Arias, Jalayne J.
AU - Ashford, J. Wesson
AU - Blacker, Deborah
AU - Chhatwal, Jasmeer P.
AU - Chin, Nathan A.
AU - Clark, Lindsay
AU - Denny, Sharon S.
AU - Goldman, Jill S.
AU - Gleason, Carey E.
AU - Grill, Joshua D.
AU - Heidebrink, Judith L.
AU - Henderson, Victor W.
AU - Lavacot, James A.
AU - Lingler, Jennifer H.
AU - Menon, Malavika
AU - Nosheny, Rachel L.
AU - Oliveira, Fabricio F.
AU - Parker, Monica W.
AU - Rahman-Filipiak, Annalise
AU - Revoori, Anwita
AU - Rumbaugh, Malia C.
AU - Sanchez, Danurys L.
AU - Schindler, Suzanne E.
AU - Schwarz, Christopher G.
AU - Toy, Leslie
AU - Tyrone, Jamie
AU - Walter, Sarah
AU - Wang, Li San
AU - Wijsman, Ellen M.
AU - Zallen, Doris T.
AU - Aggarwal, Neelum T.
N1 - Funding Information:
None of the authors identified relevant COI but most received federal funding, most from the NIA but some from other NIH institutes (NINDS, NIMH) and some from the Office of Research and Development of the Department of Veterans Affairs including the Mental Illness Research Education and Clinical Center (MIRECC). These authors include ACR, DB, NAC, LC, SSD, JG, CEG, JAL, MM, RLN, MWP, ARF, AR, MR, DS, CGS, LT, JT, EMW, SW, LSW, DTZ. In addition, some authors receive funding from the Alzheimer’s Association (JJA, JPC, JDG, NTA). JWA is an unpaid consultant of Memtrax. JPC also receives funding from the Doris Duke Charitable Foundation and serves on a medical advisory board for Humana Healthcare. JLH receives funding from Eisai/Biogen, Lilly, and Biohaven. JDG received support from BrightFocus Foundation, Eli Lilly, Genentech, Biogen, Eisa and also consults with SiteRx. JHL consulted with Genentech and Biogen. FFO received support from FAPESP –The State of São Paulo Research Foundation. SES has analyzed data provided at no cost by C2N Diagnostics to Washington University, but she has not received any personal compensation from any for-profit organizations.
Funding Information:
This research was supported in part by the Stanford Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (P30AG066515) and the War Related Illness and Injury Study Center. Multiple other grants from NIA support other authors and their centers including R01AG068206,P30AG066509, P30AG062421, P30AG072931, K01AG057796, U24AG041689 and R56AG069130. FFO receives support from The State of São Paulo Research Foundation (FAPESP), grant #2015/10109-5. ACR, JAL and LT receive support from the Office of Research and Development of the Department of Veterans Affairs (VISN 21 MIRECC, RX003152).
Publisher Copyright:
© 2022 - IOS Press. All rights reserved.
PY - 2022
Y1 - 2022
N2 - The brain changes of Alzheimer's disease and other degenerative dementias begin long before cognitive dysfunction develops, and in people with subtle cognitive complaints, clinicians often struggle to predict who will develop dementia. The public increasingly sees benefits to accessing dementia risk evidence (DRE) such as biomarkers, predictive algorithms, and genetic information, particularly as this information moves from research to demonstrated usefulness in guiding diagnosis and clinical management. For example, the knowledge that one has high levels of amyloid in the brain may lead one to seek amyloid reducing medications, plan for disability, or engage in health promoting behaviors to fight cognitive decline. Researchers often hesitate to share DRE data, either because they are insufficiently validated or reliable for use in individuals, or there are concerns about assuring responsible use and ensuring adequate understanding of potential problems when one's biomarker status is known. Concerns include warning people receiving DRE about situations in which they might be compelled to disclose their risk status potentially leading to discrimination or stigma. The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia (AGREEDementia) welcomes all concerned with how best to share and use DRE. Supporting understanding in clinicians, stakeholders, and people with or at risk for dementia and clearly delineating risks, benefits, and gaps in knowledge is vital. This brief overview describes elements that made this group effective as a model for other health conditions where there is interest in unfettered collaboration to discuss diagnostic uncertainty and the appropriate use and communication of health-related risk information.
AB - The brain changes of Alzheimer's disease and other degenerative dementias begin long before cognitive dysfunction develops, and in people with subtle cognitive complaints, clinicians often struggle to predict who will develop dementia. The public increasingly sees benefits to accessing dementia risk evidence (DRE) such as biomarkers, predictive algorithms, and genetic information, particularly as this information moves from research to demonstrated usefulness in guiding diagnosis and clinical management. For example, the knowledge that one has high levels of amyloid in the brain may lead one to seek amyloid reducing medications, plan for disability, or engage in health promoting behaviors to fight cognitive decline. Researchers often hesitate to share DRE data, either because they are insufficiently validated or reliable for use in individuals, or there are concerns about assuring responsible use and ensuring adequate understanding of potential problems when one's biomarker status is known. Concerns include warning people receiving DRE about situations in which they might be compelled to disclose their risk status potentially leading to discrimination or stigma. The Advisory Group on Risk Evidence Education for Dementia (AGREEDementia) welcomes all concerned with how best to share and use DRE. Supporting understanding in clinicians, stakeholders, and people with or at risk for dementia and clearly delineating risks, benefits, and gaps in knowledge is vital. This brief overview describes elements that made this group effective as a model for other health conditions where there is interest in unfettered collaboration to discuss diagnostic uncertainty and the appropriate use and communication of health-related risk information.
KW - Alzheimer's disease
KW - amyloid
KW - biomarkers
KW - dementia
KW - genetics
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85142940907&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.3233/JAD-220458
DO - 10.3233/JAD-220458
M3 - Review article
C2 - 35938255
AN - SCOPUS:85142940907
SN - 1387-2877
VL - 90
SP - 953
EP - 962
JO - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
JF - Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
IS - 3
ER -