TY - JOUR
T1 - Testing and interpreting measures of ovarian reserve
T2 - A committee opinion
AU - Pfeifer, Samantha
AU - Butts, Samantha
AU - Dumesic, Daniel
AU - Fossum, Gregory
AU - Giudice, Linda
AU - Gracia, Clarisa
AU - La Barbera, Andrew
AU - Odem, Randall
AU - Pisarska, Margareta
AU - Rebar, Robert
AU - Richard, Reindollar
AU - Rosen, Mitchell
AU - Sandlow, Jay
AU - Vernon, Michael
AU - Widra, Eric
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2015 American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
PY - 2015/3/1
Y1 - 2015/3/1
N2 - Currently there is no uniformly accepted definition of decreased ovarian reserve (DOR), as the term may refer to three related but distinctly different outcomes: oocyte quality, oocyte quantity, or reproductive potential. Available evidence concerning the performance of ovarian reserve tests is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity among study design, analyses and outcomes, and the lack of validated outcome measures.
AB - Currently there is no uniformly accepted definition of decreased ovarian reserve (DOR), as the term may refer to three related but distinctly different outcomes: oocyte quality, oocyte quantity, or reproductive potential. Available evidence concerning the performance of ovarian reserve tests is limited by small sample sizes, heterogeneity among study design, analyses and outcomes, and the lack of validated outcome measures.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84926215540&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.093
DO - 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.12.093
M3 - Article
C2 - 25585505
AN - SCOPUS:84926215540
SN - 0015-0282
VL - 103
SP - e9-e17
JO - Fertility and Sterility
JF - Fertility and Sterility
IS - 3
ER -