TY - JOUR
T1 - Test-retest variability in visual field testing using frequency doubling technology
AU - Horani, A.
AU - Frenkel, S.
AU - Blumenthal, Eytan Z.
PY - 2007
Y1 - 2007
N2 - PURPOSE. To quantify the magnitude of test-retest variability (TRV) for normal subjects in serial visual fields (VF) using the frequency doubling technology (FDT) instrument. METHODS. Twenty-one healthy adults, aged 23 to 60 years, underwent four serial FDT VF tests, using the full-threshold C-20 program of the Zeiss-Humphrey FDT analyzer, on one randomly chosen eye. The VF tests were spaced 2 to 4 days apart. All subjects performed two preliminary FDT tests in order to minimize any learning effect. Test-retest variability was calculated as the standard deviation of each location's sensitivity value across the four VF tests. RESULTS. Mean TRV (±SD) for the entire field was 2.44±1.32 dB. Mean TRV (±SD) for the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal hemifields were 2.48±1.3, 2.40±1.4, 2.40±1.3, and 2.48±1.3 dB, respectively. Mean TRV (±SD) for the foveal location, the 4 central, and the 12 peripheral locations were 2.49±1.4, 2.16±1.2, and 2.54±1.4 dB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. TRV was found to be rather uniform across the visual field of the commercially available FDT device, with only a mild, clinically insignificant, effect of both eccentricity and age on TRV. Variability in the FDT VF, for normal subjects, was found to be more uniform than that of both standard and short wavelength automated perimetry. In addition, a strong inverse correlation was found, in normal subjects, between the mean sensitivity and TRV.
AB - PURPOSE. To quantify the magnitude of test-retest variability (TRV) for normal subjects in serial visual fields (VF) using the frequency doubling technology (FDT) instrument. METHODS. Twenty-one healthy adults, aged 23 to 60 years, underwent four serial FDT VF tests, using the full-threshold C-20 program of the Zeiss-Humphrey FDT analyzer, on one randomly chosen eye. The VF tests were spaced 2 to 4 days apart. All subjects performed two preliminary FDT tests in order to minimize any learning effect. Test-retest variability was calculated as the standard deviation of each location's sensitivity value across the four VF tests. RESULTS. Mean TRV (±SD) for the entire field was 2.44±1.32 dB. Mean TRV (±SD) for the superior, inferior, nasal, and temporal hemifields were 2.48±1.3, 2.40±1.4, 2.40±1.3, and 2.48±1.3 dB, respectively. Mean TRV (±SD) for the foveal location, the 4 central, and the 12 peripheral locations were 2.49±1.4, 2.16±1.2, and 2.54±1.4 dB, respectively. CONCLUSIONS. TRV was found to be rather uniform across the visual field of the commercially available FDT device, with only a mild, clinically insignificant, effect of both eccentricity and age on TRV. Variability in the FDT VF, for normal subjects, was found to be more uniform than that of both standard and short wavelength automated perimetry. In addition, a strong inverse correlation was found, in normal subjects, between the mean sensitivity and TRV.
KW - Frequency doubling technology
KW - Glaucoma diagnosis
KW - Healthy subjects
KW - Human
KW - Test-retest variability
KW - Visual field
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=34250322694&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/112067210701700209
DO - 10.1177/112067210701700209
M3 - Article
C2 - 17415693
AN - SCOPUS:34250322694
SN - 1120-6721
VL - 17
SP - 203
EP - 207
JO - European Journal of Ophthalmology
JF - European Journal of Ophthalmology
IS - 2
ER -