TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study)

Nicholas M. Mohr; Karisa K. Harland; Uche E. Okoro; Brian M. Fuller; Kalyn Campbell; Morgan B. Swanson; Stephen Q. Simpson; Edith A. Parker; Luke J. Mack; Amanda Bell; Katie Dejong; Brett Faine; Anne Zepeski; Keith Mueller; Elizabeth Chrischilles; Christopher R. Carpenter; Michael P. Jones; Marcia M. Ward

doi:10.2217/cer-2020-0141

TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study)

Nicholas M. Mohr
, Karisa K. Harland
, Uche E. Okoro
, Brian M. Fuller
, Kalyn Campbell
, Morgan B. Swanson
, Stephen Q. Simpson
, Edith A. Parker
, Luke J. Mack
, Amanda Bell
, Katie Dejong
, Brett Faine
, Anne Zepeski
, Keith Mueller
, Elizabeth Chrischilles
, Christopher R. Carpenter
, Michael P. Jones
, Marcia M. Ward

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

8 Scopus citations

Abstract

Sepsis is a life-threatening infection that affects over 1.7 million Americans annually. Low-volume rural hospitals have worse sepsis outcomes, and emergency department (ED)-based telemedicine (tele-ED) has been one promising strategy for improving rural sepsis care. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of tele-ED consultation on sepsis care and outcomes in rural ED patients. The TELEvISED study is a multicenter (n = 25) retrospective propensity-matched comparative effectiveness study of tele-ED care for rural sepsis patients in a mature tele-ED network. Telemedicine-exposed patients will be matched with non telemedicine patients using a propensity score to predict tele-ED use. The primary outcome is 28-day hospital free days, and secondary outcomes include adherence with guidelines, mortality and organ failure. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04441944.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	77-91
Number of pages	15
Journal	Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research
Volume	10
Issue number	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0141
State	Published - Feb 2021

Keywords

emergency service
hospital
hospitals
rural
sepsis
telemedicine

Access to Document

10.2217/cer-2020-0141

Cite this

Mohr, N. M., Harland, K. K., Okoro, U. E., Fuller, B. M., Campbell, K., Swanson, M. B., Simpson, S. Q., Parker, E. A., Mack, L. J., Bell, A., Dejong, K., Faine, B., Zepeski, A., Mueller, K., Chrischilles, E., Carpenter, C. R., Jones, M. P., & Ward, M. M. (2021). TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study). Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, 10(2), 77-91. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0141

@article{3a8ab0db93884ed7bf790f2ec4fc720c,

title = "TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study)",

abstract = "Sepsis is a life-threatening infection that affects over 1.7 million Americans annually. Low-volume rural hospitals have worse sepsis outcomes, and emergency department (ED)-based telemedicine (tele-ED) has been one promising strategy for improving rural sepsis care. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of tele-ED consultation on sepsis care and outcomes in rural ED patients. The TELEvISED study is a multicenter (n = 25) retrospective propensity-matched comparative effectiveness study of tele-ED care for rural sepsis patients in a mature tele-ED network. Telemedicine-exposed patients will be matched with non telemedicine patients using a propensity score to predict tele-ED use. The primary outcome is 28-day hospital free days, and secondary outcomes include adherence with guidelines, mortality and organ failure. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04441944.",

keywords = "emergency service, hospital, hospitals, rural, sepsis, telemedicine",

author = "Mohr, \{Nicholas M.\} and Harland, \{Karisa K.\} and Okoro, \{Uche E.\} and Fuller, \{Brian M.\} and Kalyn Campbell and Swanson, \{Morgan B.\} and Simpson, \{Stephen Q.\} and Parker, \{Edith A.\} and Mack, \{Luke J.\} and Amanda Bell and Katie Dejong and Brett Faine and Anne Zepeski and Keith Mueller and Elizabeth Chrischilles and Carpenter, \{Christopher R.\} and Jones, \{Michael P.\} and Ward, \{Marcia M.\}",

note = "Publisher Copyright: {\textcopyright} 2021 Future Medicine Ltd.",

year = "2021",

month = feb,

doi = "10.2217/cer-2020-0141",

language = "English",

volume = "10",

pages = "77--91",

journal = "Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research",

issn = "2042-6305",

number = "2",

}

Mohr, NM, Harland, KK, Okoro, UE, Fuller, BM, Campbell, K, Swanson, MB, Simpson, SQ, Parker, EA, Mack, LJ, Bell, A, Dejong, K, Faine, B, Zepeski, A, Mueller, K, Chrischilles, E, Carpenter, CR, Jones, MP & Ward, MM 2021, 'TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study)', Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 77-91. https://doi.org/10.2217/cer-2020-0141

TY - JOUR

T1 - TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments

T2 - a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study)

AU - Mohr, Nicholas M.

AU - Harland, Karisa K.

AU - Okoro, Uche E.

AU - Fuller, Brian M.

AU - Campbell, Kalyn

AU - Swanson, Morgan B.

AU - Simpson, Stephen Q.

AU - Parker, Edith A.

AU - Mack, Luke J.

AU - Bell, Amanda

AU - Dejong, Katie

AU - Faine, Brett

AU - Zepeski, Anne

AU - Mueller, Keith

AU - Chrischilles, Elizabeth

AU - Carpenter, Christopher R.

AU - Jones, Michael P.

AU - Ward, Marcia M.

PY - 2021/2

Y1 - 2021/2

N2 - Sepsis is a life-threatening infection that affects over 1.7 million Americans annually. Low-volume rural hospitals have worse sepsis outcomes, and emergency department (ED)-based telemedicine (tele-ED) has been one promising strategy for improving rural sepsis care. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of tele-ED consultation on sepsis care and outcomes in rural ED patients. The TELEvISED study is a multicenter (n = 25) retrospective propensity-matched comparative effectiveness study of tele-ED care for rural sepsis patients in a mature tele-ED network. Telemedicine-exposed patients will be matched with non telemedicine patients using a propensity score to predict tele-ED use. The primary outcome is 28-day hospital free days, and secondary outcomes include adherence with guidelines, mortality and organ failure. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04441944.

AB - Sepsis is a life-threatening infection that affects over 1.7 million Americans annually. Low-volume rural hospitals have worse sepsis outcomes, and emergency department (ED)-based telemedicine (tele-ED) has been one promising strategy for improving rural sepsis care. The objective of this study is to evaluate the impact of tele-ED consultation on sepsis care and outcomes in rural ED patients. The TELEvISED study is a multicenter (n = 25) retrospective propensity-matched comparative effectiveness study of tele-ED care for rural sepsis patients in a mature tele-ED network. Telemedicine-exposed patients will be matched with non telemedicine patients using a propensity score to predict tele-ED use. The primary outcome is 28-day hospital free days, and secondary outcomes include adherence with guidelines, mortality and organ failure. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04441944.

KW - emergency service

KW - hospital

KW - hospitals

KW - rural

KW - sepsis

KW - telemedicine

UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85100532053

U2 - 10.2217/cer-2020-0141

DO - 10.2217/cer-2020-0141

M3 - Article

C2 - 33470848

AN - SCOPUS:85100532053

SN - 2042-6305

VL - 10

SP - 77

EP - 91

JO - Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

JF - Journal of Comparative Effectiveness Research

IS - 2

ER -

TELEmedicine as an intervention for sepsis in emergency departments: a multicenter, comparative effectiveness study (TELEvISED Study)

Abstract

Keywords

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this