TY - JOUR
T1 - Techniques of biliary drainage for acute cholangitis
T2 - Tokyo Guidelines
AU - Tsuyuguchi, Toshio
AU - Takada, Tadahiro
AU - Kawarada, Yoshifumi
AU - Nimura, Yuji
AU - Wada, Keita
AU - Nagino, Masato
AU - Mayumi, Toshihiko
AU - Yoshida, Masahiro
AU - Miura, Fumihiko
AU - Tanaka, Atsushi
AU - Yamashita, Yuichi
AU - Hirota, Masahiko
AU - Hirata, Koichi
AU - Yasuda, Hideki
AU - Kimura, Yasutoshi
AU - Strasberg, Steven
AU - Pitt, Henry
AU - Büchler, Markus W.
AU - Neuhaus, Horst
AU - Belghiti, Jacques
AU - de Santibanes, Eduardo
AU - Fan, Sheung Tat
AU - Liau, Kui Hin
AU - Sachakul, Vibul
PY - 2007/1
Y1 - 2007/1
N2 - Biliary decompression and drainage done in a timely manner is the cornerstone of acute cholangitis treatment. The mortality rate of acute cholangitis was extremely high when no interventional procedures, other than open drainage, were available. At present, endoscopic drainage is the procedure of first choice, in view of its safety and effectiveness. In patients with severe (grade III) disease, defined according to the severity assessment criteria in the Guidelines, biliary drainage should be done promptly with respiration management, while patients with moderate (grade II) disease also need to undergo drainage promptly with close monitoring of their responses to the primary care. For endoscopic drainage, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) or stent placement procedures are performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported no difference in the drainage effect of these two procedures, but case-series studies have indicated the frequent occurrence of hemorrhage associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), and complications such as pancreatitis. Although the usefulness of percutaneous transhepatic drainage is supported by the case-series studies, its lower success rate and higher complication rates makes it a second-option procedure.
AB - Biliary decompression and drainage done in a timely manner is the cornerstone of acute cholangitis treatment. The mortality rate of acute cholangitis was extremely high when no interventional procedures, other than open drainage, were available. At present, endoscopic drainage is the procedure of first choice, in view of its safety and effectiveness. In patients with severe (grade III) disease, defined according to the severity assessment criteria in the Guidelines, biliary drainage should be done promptly with respiration management, while patients with moderate (grade II) disease also need to undergo drainage promptly with close monitoring of their responses to the primary care. For endoscopic drainage, endoscopic nasobiliary drainage (ENBD) or stent placement procedures are performed. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) have reported no difference in the drainage effect of these two procedures, but case-series studies have indicated the frequent occurrence of hemorrhage associated with endoscopic sphincterotomy (EST), and complications such as pancreatitis. Although the usefulness of percutaneous transhepatic drainage is supported by the case-series studies, its lower success rate and higher complication rates makes it a second-option procedure.
KW - Biliary drainage
KW - Cholangitis
KW - Endoscopic cholangiopancreatography
KW - Endoscopic sphincterotomy
KW - Endoscopy
KW - Guidelines
KW - Percutaneous
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=33846675601&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00534-006-1154-9
DO - 10.1007/s00534-006-1154-9
M3 - Article
C2 - 17252295
AN - SCOPUS:33846675601
SN - 0944-1166
VL - 14
SP - 35
EP - 45
JO - Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
JF - Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery
IS - 1
ER -