TY - JOUR
T1 - Technical and clinical outcomes in concurrent multivessel occlusions treated with mechanical thrombectomy
T2 - Insights from the STAR collaboration
AU - Saad, Hassan
AU - Eshraghi, Sheila
AU - Alawieh, Ali M.
AU - Akbik, Feras
AU - Cawley, C. Michael
AU - Howard, Brian M.
AU - Ash, Makenna
AU - Hsu, Alice
AU - Pabaney, Aqueel
AU - Maier, Ilko
AU - Al Kasab, Sami
AU - El Naamani, Kareem
AU - Jabbour, Pascal
AU - Kim, Joon Tae
AU - Wolfe, Stacey Q.
AU - Rai, Ansaar
AU - Starke, Robert M.
AU - Psychogios, Marios Nikos
AU - Shaban, Amir
AU - Arthur, Adam S.
AU - Yoshimura, Shinichi
AU - Fragata, Isabel
AU - Cuellar-Saenz, Hugo H.
AU - Polifka, Adam J.
AU - Mascitelli, Justin
AU - Osbun, Joshua W.
AU - Matouk, Charles
AU - Park, Min S.
AU - Levitt, Michael R.
AU - Dumont, Travis M.
AU - Williamson, Richard
AU - Spiotta, Alejandro M.
AU - Grossberg, Jonathan A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 BMJ Publishing Group. All rights reserved.
PY - 2023/11/1
Y1 - 2023/11/1
N2 - Background Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has become the mainstay treatment for large vessel occlusion, with favorable safety and efficacy profile. However, the safety and efficacy of EVT in concurrent multi-territory occlusions (MTVOs) remains unclear. Objective To investigate the prevalence, clinical and technical outcomes of concurrent EVT for MTVOs. Methods Data were included from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) with 32 stroke centers for EVT performed to treat bilateral anterior or concurrent anterior and posterior circulation occlusions between 2017 and 2021. Patients with MTVO were identified, and propensity score matching was used to compare this group with patients with occlusion in a single arterial territory. Results Of a total of 7723 patients who underwent EVT for acute ischemic stroke, 54 (0.7%) underwent EVT for MTVOs (mean age 69±12.5; female 50%). 28% had bilateral and 72% had anterior and posterior circulations occlusions. The rate of successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3), complications, modified Rankin score at 90 days, and mortality was not significantly different between the matched cohorts. Multivariate analysis confirmed that MTVOs were not associated with poor functional outcome, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or longer procedure time. Conclusion Compared with EVT for single vessel occlusions, EVT in appropriately selected patients with MTVOs has a similar efficacy and safety profile.
AB - Background Endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) has become the mainstay treatment for large vessel occlusion, with favorable safety and efficacy profile. However, the safety and efficacy of EVT in concurrent multi-territory occlusions (MTVOs) remains unclear. Objective To investigate the prevalence, clinical and technical outcomes of concurrent EVT for MTVOs. Methods Data were included from the Stroke Thrombectomy and Aneurysm Registry (STAR) with 32 stroke centers for EVT performed to treat bilateral anterior or concurrent anterior and posterior circulation occlusions between 2017 and 2021. Patients with MTVO were identified, and propensity score matching was used to compare this group with patients with occlusion in a single arterial territory. Results Of a total of 7723 patients who underwent EVT for acute ischemic stroke, 54 (0.7%) underwent EVT for MTVOs (mean age 69±12.5; female 50%). 28% had bilateral and 72% had anterior and posterior circulations occlusions. The rate of successful recanalization (Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction 2b/3), complications, modified Rankin score at 90 days, and mortality was not significantly different between the matched cohorts. Multivariate analysis confirmed that MTVOs were not associated with poor functional outcome, symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage, or longer procedure time. Conclusion Compared with EVT for single vessel occlusions, EVT in appropriately selected patients with MTVOs has a similar efficacy and safety profile.
KW - intervention
KW - stroke
KW - thrombectomy
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85158849692&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jnis-2022-019608
DO - 10.1136/jnis-2022-019608
M3 - Article
C2 - 36597932
AN - SCOPUS:85158849692
SN - 1759-8478
VL - 15
SP - 1072
EP - 1077
JO - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
JF - Journal of NeuroInterventional Surgery
IS - 11
ER -