TY - JOUR
T1 - Task-specific movement training improves kinematics and pain during the Y-balance test and hip muscle strength in females with patellofemoral pain
AU - Arhos, Elanna K.
AU - Lang, Catherine E.
AU - Steger-May, Karen
AU - Van Dillen, Linda R.
AU - Yemm, Barbara
AU - Salsich, Gretchen B.
N1 - Funding Information:
Funding Funding for this project was provided by the NIH/National Center for Advancing Translational Sciences (NCATS) grant UL1 TR000448, NIH/National Center for Medical Rehabilitation Research grant R01 HD047709, Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational Sciences CTSA 705, the Orthopaedic Section of the American Physical Therapy Association (APTA) and the Saint Louis University Program in Physical Therapy, Doisy College of Health Sciences. Competing interests None declared. Patient consent for publication Not required. Ethics approval Informed consent was obtained from all participants and the study was approved by the Saint Louis University Institutional Review Board.
Publisher Copyright:
©
PY - 2021/9/1
Y1 - 2021/9/1
N2 - Objectives Task-specific movement training is a proposed intervention for patellofemoral pain aimed to optimise movement during daily tasks. Focused, progressive task practice emphasising optimal limb alignment may yield improvements in performance-based function and hip muscle strength, and transfer learnt movement patterns to untrained tasks. The purpose of this study was to determine if task-specific movement training improves performance-based function (composite score, movement, pain during movement) in an untrained task. Our secondary purpose was to test whether hip muscle strength improved following the movement training intervention. Methods This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective, non-randomised, within-group, double-baseline study. Twenty-three females with patellofemoral pain underwent task-specific movement training two times/week for 6 weeks. Outcomes were collected at three time points: enrolment (baseline), 6 weeks (preintervention) and 12 weeks (postintervention). A repeated measures analysis of variance tested whether the change during the intervention phase was greater than the change during the control phase. Y-balance composite score, hip and knee kinematics and pain during the Y-balance test were primary outcome measures; strength of the hip lateral rotator, abductor and extensor muscles was a secondary outcome measure. Results The change in composite score for the Y-balance test was not statistically significantly different between the intervention and control phases (p=0.16). The change during the intervention phase exceeded the change during the control phase for hip and knee kinematics and pain during the Y-balance test, with all variables improving (p<0.0001). The change during the intervention phase was greater than the control phase for hip muscle strength, with all variables improving (p<0.04). Conclusion Although the Y-balance test composite score did not improve, performance-based function during an untrained task, measured by movement and pain during the test, improved following task-specific movement training. Hip muscle strength improved, despite no focused muscle strengthening. Level of evidence Level II.
AB - Objectives Task-specific movement training is a proposed intervention for patellofemoral pain aimed to optimise movement during daily tasks. Focused, progressive task practice emphasising optimal limb alignment may yield improvements in performance-based function and hip muscle strength, and transfer learnt movement patterns to untrained tasks. The purpose of this study was to determine if task-specific movement training improves performance-based function (composite score, movement, pain during movement) in an untrained task. Our secondary purpose was to test whether hip muscle strength improved following the movement training intervention. Methods This study was a secondary analysis of a prospective, non-randomised, within-group, double-baseline study. Twenty-three females with patellofemoral pain underwent task-specific movement training two times/week for 6 weeks. Outcomes were collected at three time points: enrolment (baseline), 6 weeks (preintervention) and 12 weeks (postintervention). A repeated measures analysis of variance tested whether the change during the intervention phase was greater than the change during the control phase. Y-balance composite score, hip and knee kinematics and pain during the Y-balance test were primary outcome measures; strength of the hip lateral rotator, abductor and extensor muscles was a secondary outcome measure. Results The change in composite score for the Y-balance test was not statistically significantly different between the intervention and control phases (p=0.16). The change during the intervention phase exceeded the change during the control phase for hip and knee kinematics and pain during the Y-balance test, with all variables improving (p<0.0001). The change during the intervention phase was greater than the control phase for hip muscle strength, with all variables improving (p<0.04). Conclusion Although the Y-balance test composite score did not improve, performance-based function during an untrained task, measured by movement and pain during the test, improved following task-specific movement training. Hip muscle strength improved, despite no focused muscle strengthening. Level of evidence Level II.
KW - knee
KW - knee injuries
KW - physical and rehabilitation medicine
KW - treatment outcome
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85106151716&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000551
DO - 10.1136/jisakos-2020-000551
M3 - Article
C2 - 34001505
AN - SCOPUS:85106151716
SN - 2059-7754
VL - 6
SP - 277
EP - 282
JO - Journal of ISAKOS
JF - Journal of ISAKOS
IS - 5
ER -