TY - JOUR
T1 - Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement
T2 - diagnostic value for differentiating HCC from other primary liver carcinomas
AU - Cannella, Roberto
AU - Fraum, Tyler J.
AU - Ludwig, Daniel R.
AU - Borhani, Amir A.
AU - Tsung, Allan
AU - Furlan, Alessandro
AU - Fowler, Kathryn J.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2021, European Society of Radiology.
PY - 2021/9
Y1 - 2021/9
N2 - Objectives: To evaluate targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement as potential new LI-RADS features for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other non-HCC primary liver carcinomas (PLCs). Methods: This IRB-approved, retrospective study was performed at two liver transplant centers. The final population included 375 patients with pathologically proven lesions imaged between 2007 and 2017 with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. The cohort consisted of 165 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and 74 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas, with the addition of 136 HCCs for control. Two abdominal radiologists (R1; R2) independently reviewed the imaging studies (112 CT; 263 MRI) and recorded the presence of targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images and features of tumor vascular involvement including encasement, narrowing, tethering, occlusion, and obliteration. The sensitivity and specificity of each feature were calculated for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs. Cohen’s kappa (k) test was used to assess inter-reader agreement. Results: The sensitivity of targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs was 27.5% and 32.6% (R1 and R2) and the specificity was 98.2% and 97.3% (R1 and R2). Among the features of tumor vascular involvement, those providing the highest sensitivity for non-HCC PLCs were vascular encasement (R1: 34.3%; R2: 37.2%) and obliteration (R1: 25.5%; R2: 29.7%). The highest specificity for non-HCC PLCs was provided by tethering (R1: 100%; R2: 97.1%) and occlusion (R1: 99.3%; R2: 99.3%). The inter-reader agreement was moderate to substantial (k = 0.48–0.77). Conclusions: Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images and features of tumor vascular involvement demonstrated high specificity for non-HCC malignancy. Key Points: • Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement have high specificity (92–100%) for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs, regardless of the presence of liver risk factors. • In the subset of patients with risk factors for HCC, the sensitivity of signs of tumor vascular involvement decreases for both readers (1.7–20.3%), while the specificity increases reaching values higher than 94.2%. • The inter-reader agreement is substantial for targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images (k = 0.74) and moderate to substantial for signs of tumor vascular involvement (k = 0.48–0.77).
AB - Objectives: To evaluate targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement as potential new LI-RADS features for differentiating hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) from other non-HCC primary liver carcinomas (PLCs). Methods: This IRB-approved, retrospective study was performed at two liver transplant centers. The final population included 375 patients with pathologically proven lesions imaged between 2007 and 2017 with contrast-enhanced CT or MRI. The cohort consisted of 165 intrahepatic cholangiocarcinomas and 74 combined hepatocellular-cholangiocarcinomas, with the addition of 136 HCCs for control. Two abdominal radiologists (R1; R2) independently reviewed the imaging studies (112 CT; 263 MRI) and recorded the presence of targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images and features of tumor vascular involvement including encasement, narrowing, tethering, occlusion, and obliteration. The sensitivity and specificity of each feature were calculated for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs. Cohen’s kappa (k) test was used to assess inter-reader agreement. Results: The sensitivity of targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs was 27.5% and 32.6% (R1 and R2) and the specificity was 98.2% and 97.3% (R1 and R2). Among the features of tumor vascular involvement, those providing the highest sensitivity for non-HCC PLCs were vascular encasement (R1: 34.3%; R2: 37.2%) and obliteration (R1: 25.5%; R2: 29.7%). The highest specificity for non-HCC PLCs was provided by tethering (R1: 100%; R2: 97.1%) and occlusion (R1: 99.3%; R2: 99.3%). The inter-reader agreement was moderate to substantial (k = 0.48–0.77). Conclusions: Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images and features of tumor vascular involvement demonstrated high specificity for non-HCC malignancy. Key Points: • Targetoid appearance on T2-weighted imaging and signs of tumor vascular involvement have high specificity (92–100%) for the diagnosis of non-HCC PLCs, regardless of the presence of liver risk factors. • In the subset of patients with risk factors for HCC, the sensitivity of signs of tumor vascular involvement decreases for both readers (1.7–20.3%), while the specificity increases reaching values higher than 94.2%. • The inter-reader agreement is substantial for targetoid appearance on T2-weighted images (k = 0.74) and moderate to substantial for signs of tumor vascular involvement (k = 0.48–0.77).
KW - Hepatocellular carcinoma
KW - Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma
KW - Liver neoplasms
KW - Magnetic resonance imaging
KW - Tomography, X-ray computed
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85101467939&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1007/s00330-021-07743-x
DO - 10.1007/s00330-021-07743-x
M3 - Article
C2 - 33590319
AN - SCOPUS:85101467939
SN - 0938-7994
VL - 31
SP - 6868
EP - 6878
JO - European Radiology
JF - European Radiology
IS - 9
ER -