TY - JOUR
T1 - Synthesis and evaluation of (+) and (−)‐2,2‐difluorocitrate as inhibitors of rat‐liver ATP‐citrate lyase and porcine‐heart aconitase
AU - SAXTY, Barbara A.
AU - NOVELLI, Riccardo
AU - DOLLE, Roland E.
AU - KRUSE, Lawrence I.
AU - REID, David G.
AU - CAMILLERI, Patrick
AU - WELLS, Timothy N.C.
PY - 1991/12
Y1 - 1991/12
N2 - The enantiomers (+) and (−)‐2,2‐difluorocitrate have been synthesized. Both are good inhibitors of ATP‐citrate lyase, showing competitive inhibition against citrate, with Kis= 0.7 μM for (+)‐2,2‐difluorocitrate and 3.2 μM for (−)‐2,2‐difluorocitrate. The inhibition patterns with either ATP or CoA as the varied substrate were uncompetitive and mixed, respectively, but with much weaker inhibition constants. Neither isomer undergoes carbon‐carbon bond cleavage as a substrate and there is no evidence of irreversible time‐dependent inactivation. When ATP‐citrate lyase is incubated with CoA and difluorocitrate, the maximal intrinsic ATPase rate is 10% of the citrate‐induced rate for the (+)‐enantiomer and 2% for the (−)‐enantiomer. 19F‐NMR studies confirm that only the (+)‐enantiomer is chemically processed. The effects of the difluorocitrate enantiomers on the reaction catalysed by aconitase were examined. (−)‐2,2‐Difluorocitrate is a competitive inhibitor against citrate (Kis= 1.5 μM), whereas the (+)‐enantiomer is a relatively poor mixed inhibitor (Ki > 300 μM). The (−)‐enantiomer irreversibly inactivates aconitase at 1.1 min‐1· mM‐1 at 25°C and pH 7.4, whereas no irreversible inhibition is seen with the (+)‐enantiomer. Therefore, it would be expected that the (+)‐enantiomer would slow the rate of acetyl‐CoA synthesis in vivo, without inhibiting the citric acid cycle.
AB - The enantiomers (+) and (−)‐2,2‐difluorocitrate have been synthesized. Both are good inhibitors of ATP‐citrate lyase, showing competitive inhibition against citrate, with Kis= 0.7 μM for (+)‐2,2‐difluorocitrate and 3.2 μM for (−)‐2,2‐difluorocitrate. The inhibition patterns with either ATP or CoA as the varied substrate were uncompetitive and mixed, respectively, but with much weaker inhibition constants. Neither isomer undergoes carbon‐carbon bond cleavage as a substrate and there is no evidence of irreversible time‐dependent inactivation. When ATP‐citrate lyase is incubated with CoA and difluorocitrate, the maximal intrinsic ATPase rate is 10% of the citrate‐induced rate for the (+)‐enantiomer and 2% for the (−)‐enantiomer. 19F‐NMR studies confirm that only the (+)‐enantiomer is chemically processed. The effects of the difluorocitrate enantiomers on the reaction catalysed by aconitase were examined. (−)‐2,2‐Difluorocitrate is a competitive inhibitor against citrate (Kis= 1.5 μM), whereas the (+)‐enantiomer is a relatively poor mixed inhibitor (Ki > 300 μM). The (−)‐enantiomer irreversibly inactivates aconitase at 1.1 min‐1· mM‐1 at 25°C and pH 7.4, whereas no irreversible inhibition is seen with the (+)‐enantiomer. Therefore, it would be expected that the (+)‐enantiomer would slow the rate of acetyl‐CoA synthesis in vivo, without inhibiting the citric acid cycle.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=0026321684&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16448.x
DO - 10.1111/j.1432-1033.1991.tb16448.x
M3 - Article
C2 - 1765100
AN - SCOPUS:0026321684
SN - 0014-2956
VL - 202
SP - 889
EP - 896
JO - European Journal of Biochemistry
JF - European Journal of Biochemistry
IS - 3
ER -