Symbols of the Struggle: Descriptive Representation and Issue-Based Symbolism in US House Speeches

  • Bryce J. Dietrich
  • , Matthew Hayes

    Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

    7 Scopus citations

    Abstract

    The rhetoric legislators use to discuss race is both important and understudied. In this article, we explore whether the presence of Black legislators influences symbolic representation in the US House. We ask three questions. First, do Black and white members of Congress talk about issues involving race at different rates? Second, when Black and white members of Congress talk about race, do they do so in different ways? Third, do these rhetorical differences matter for Black constituents? Using data from 790,654 US House floor speeches, the Cooperative Election Study, and data from an original survey experiment, we demonstrate that Black legislators are more likely to talk about civil rights, and they employ significantly more symbolic references when they do. This symbolism is linked to an increase in Black voter turnout as well as changes in the evaluations of Black constituents, underscoring that symbolic responsiveness is an important facet of representation for African Americans.

    Original languageEnglish
    Pages (from-to)1368-1384
    Number of pages17
    JournalJournal of Politics
    Volume85
    Issue number4
    DOIs
    StatePublished - Oct 2023

    Fingerprint

    Dive into the research topics of 'Symbols of the Struggle: Descriptive Representation and Issue-Based Symbolism in US House Speeches'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

    Cite this