Survival outcomes for head and neck patients with Medicaid: A health insurance paradox

Jaibir S. Pannu, Matthew C. Simpson, Eric Adjei Boakye, Sean T. Massa, Lauren M. Cass, Sai D. Challapalli, Rebecca L. Rohde, Nosayaba Osazuwa-Peters

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

11 Scopus citations

Abstract

Purpose: Privately insured patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) typically have better outcomes; however, differential outcome among Medicaid versus the uninsured is unclear. We aimed to describe outcome disparities among HNC patients uninsured versus on Medicaid. Methods: A cohort of 18–64-year-old adults (n = 57 920) with index HNC from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 18 database (2007–2015) was analyzed using Fine and Gray multivariable competing risks proportional hazards models for HNC-specific mortality. Results: Medicaid (sdHR = 1.65, 95% CI 1.58, 1.72) and uninsured patients (sdHR = 1.55, 95% CI 1.46, 1.65) had significantly greater mortality hazard than non-Medicaid patients. Medicaid patients had increased HNC mortality hazard than those uninsured. Conclusion: Compared with those uninsured, HNC patients on Medicaid did not have superior survival, suggesting that there may be underlying mechanisms/factors inherent in this patient population that could undermine access to care benefits from being on Medicaid.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)2136-2147
Number of pages12
JournalHead and Neck
Volume43
Issue number7
DOIs
StatePublished - Jul 2021

Keywords

  • Medicaid paradox
  • SEER
  • head and neck cancer
  • health disparities
  • health insurance status
  • stage of presentation
  • uninsured

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Survival outcomes for head and neck patients with Medicaid: A health insurance paradox'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this