Surgical Techniques for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy: State of Art and Review of the Literature

  • Beatrice Trabalza Marinucci
  • , Massimiliano Mancini
  • , Alessandra Siciliani
  • , Fabiana Messa
  • , Giorgia Piccioni
  • , Antonio D’Andrilli
  • , Giulio Maurizi
  • , Anna Maria Ciccone
  • , Cecilia Menna
  • , Camilla Vanni
  • , Matteo Tiracorrendo
  • , Erino Angelo Rendina
  • , Mohsen Ibrahim

Research output: Contribution to journalReview articlepeer-review

5 Scopus citations

Abstract

Non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for 80–85% of all lung cancers. Approximately 20% of patients with NSCLC are diagnosed with stage IIIA–IIIB disease, for which the optimal treatment remains unclear. Meta-analyses reveal that neoadjuvant/perioperative ICI–chemotherapy significantly improves pathological complete response (pCR), overall survival (OS), major pathological response (MPR), and R0 rate compared to standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Resectability is achieved when R0 resection can be performed after surgery. Radiographic downstaging often does not correspond to surgical downstaging. In fact, intra-operative fibrosis due to chemo-immunotherapy (synonymous with ICI–chemotherapy) can create adhesions and consequent difficult planes for dissection. Thus, pneumonectomy cannot be avoided. Even the suspicion of N2 after neoadjuvant treatment is considered a limitation of upfront surgery because of the risk of pneumonectomy. The aim of this review is to explore the literature on the technical strategies for surgical excision of NSCLC after chemo-immunotherapy, addressing even the most challenging scenarios.

Original languageEnglish
Article number638
JournalCancers
Volume17
Issue number4
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2025

Keywords

  • lung surgery
  • neoadjuvant immunotherapy
  • non-small-cell lung cancer
  • resectability

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Surgical Techniques for Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemo-Immunotherapy: State of Art and Review of the Literature'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this