TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical Planning for Adult Spinal Deformity
T2 - Anticipated Sagittal Alignment Corrections According to the Surgical Level
AU - on behalf of International Spine Study Group (ISSG)
AU - Lafage, Renaud
AU - Schwab, Frank
AU - Elysee, Jonathan
AU - Smith, Justin S.
AU - Alshabab, Basel Sheikh
AU - Passias, Peter
AU - Klineberg, Eric
AU - Kim, Han Jo
AU - Shaffrey, Christopher
AU - Burton, Douglas
AU - Gupta, Munish
AU - Mundis, Gregory M.
AU - Ames, Christopher
AU - Bess, Shay
AU - Lafage, Virginie
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© The Author(s) 2021.
PY - 2022/10
Y1 - 2022/10
N2 - Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: Establish simultaneous focal and regional corrective guidelines accounting for reciprocal global and pelvic compensation. Methods: 433 ASD patients (mean age 62.9 yrs, 81.3% F) who underwent corrective realignment (minimum L1-pelvis) were included. Sagittal parameters, and segmental and regional Cobb angles were assessed pre and post-op. Virtual postoperative alignment was generated by combining post-op alignment of the fused spine with the pre-op alignment on the unfused thoracic kyphosis and the pre-op pelvic retroversion. Regression models were then generated to predict the relative impact of segmental (L4-L5) and regional (L1-L4) corrections on PT, SVA (virtual), and TPA. Results: Baseline analysis revealed distal (L4-S1) lordosis of 33 ± 15°, flat proximal (L1-L4) lordosis (1.7 ± 17°), and segmental kyphosis from L2-L3 to T10-T11. Post-op, there was no mean change in distal lordosis (L5-S1 decreased by 2°, and L4-L5 increased by 2°), while the more proximal lordosis increased by 18 ± 16°. Regression formulas revealed that Δ10° in distal lordosis resulted in Δ10° in TPA, associated with Δ100 mm in SVA or Δ3° in PT; Δ10° in proximal lordosis yielded Δ5° in TPA associated with Δ50 mm in SVA; and finally Δ10° in thoraco-lumbar junction yielded Δ2.5° in TPA associated with Δ25 mm in SVA and no impact on PT correction. Conclusions: Overall impact of lumbar lordosis restoration is critically determined by location of correction. Distal correction leads to a greater impact on global alignment and pelvic retroversion. More specifically, it can be assumed that 1° L4-S1 lordosis correction produces 1° change in TPA / 10 mm change in SVA and 0.5° in PT.
AB - Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Objectives: Establish simultaneous focal and regional corrective guidelines accounting for reciprocal global and pelvic compensation. Methods: 433 ASD patients (mean age 62.9 yrs, 81.3% F) who underwent corrective realignment (minimum L1-pelvis) were included. Sagittal parameters, and segmental and regional Cobb angles were assessed pre and post-op. Virtual postoperative alignment was generated by combining post-op alignment of the fused spine with the pre-op alignment on the unfused thoracic kyphosis and the pre-op pelvic retroversion. Regression models were then generated to predict the relative impact of segmental (L4-L5) and regional (L1-L4) corrections on PT, SVA (virtual), and TPA. Results: Baseline analysis revealed distal (L4-S1) lordosis of 33 ± 15°, flat proximal (L1-L4) lordosis (1.7 ± 17°), and segmental kyphosis from L2-L3 to T10-T11. Post-op, there was no mean change in distal lordosis (L5-S1 decreased by 2°, and L4-L5 increased by 2°), while the more proximal lordosis increased by 18 ± 16°. Regression formulas revealed that Δ10° in distal lordosis resulted in Δ10° in TPA, associated with Δ100 mm in SVA or Δ3° in PT; Δ10° in proximal lordosis yielded Δ5° in TPA associated with Δ50 mm in SVA; and finally Δ10° in thoraco-lumbar junction yielded Δ2.5° in TPA associated with Δ25 mm in SVA and no impact on PT correction. Conclusions: Overall impact of lumbar lordosis restoration is critically determined by location of correction. Distal correction leads to a greater impact on global alignment and pelvic retroversion. More specifically, it can be assumed that 1° L4-S1 lordosis correction produces 1° change in TPA / 10 mm change in SVA and 0.5° in PT.
KW - adult spinal deformity
KW - predictive model
KW - regional correction
KW - sagittal alignment
KW - segmental correction
KW - simulation
KW - surgical planning
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85100953277&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1177/2192568220988504
DO - 10.1177/2192568220988504
M3 - Article
C2 - 33567927
AN - SCOPUS:85100953277
SN - 2192-5682
VL - 12
SP - 1761
EP - 1769
JO - Global Spine Journal
JF - Global Spine Journal
IS - 8
ER -