TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgical aortic valve replacement after percutaneous aortic valve implantation
T2 - What have we learned?
AU - Litzler, Pierre Yves
AU - Cribier, Alain
AU - Zajarias, Alan
AU - Comte, Diane
AU - Eltchaninoff, Hélène
AU - Tron, Christophe
AU - Haas-Hubscher, Catherine
AU - Bessou, Jean Paul
N1 - Funding Information:
Supported by ARCTCV (Research Association-Cardiac Surgery Department-Rouen University Hospital-Rouen-France).
PY - 2008/9
Y1 - 2008/9
N2 - Objective: We report the first case description of surgical aortic valve replacement after percutaneous valve implantation. Methods: An 87-year-old man with severe aortic stenosis who was rejected for surgical intervention underwent percutaneous valve implantation through a retrograde femoral approach. The procedure was complicated by cardiogenic shock caused by severe aortic insufficiency, leading to emergency surgical aortic valve replacement. Results: The operative findings revealed the presence of commissural paravalvular leaks and centrally malapposed leaflets. Surgical replacement was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on day 30, despite a challenging postoperative course. His follow-up at 1 year has been uneventful. This case illustrates that overdilatation of the stent is not recommended because it might worsen central aortic insufficiency. Moreover, the transapical route should be considered when the appropriately sized prosthesis is unable to be inserted because of inappropriate vascular access. However, despite an initial "prohibitive" surgical risk, surgical aortic valvular replacement after percutaneous valve implantation could be easily performed. Conclusion: Percutaneous heart valve implantation, which provides a larger surface area than balloon valvotomy, can be offered to patients with cardiogenic shock and severe comorbidities to improve their hemodynamic state and reduce their surgical risk.
AB - Objective: We report the first case description of surgical aortic valve replacement after percutaneous valve implantation. Methods: An 87-year-old man with severe aortic stenosis who was rejected for surgical intervention underwent percutaneous valve implantation through a retrograde femoral approach. The procedure was complicated by cardiogenic shock caused by severe aortic insufficiency, leading to emergency surgical aortic valve replacement. Results: The operative findings revealed the presence of commissural paravalvular leaks and centrally malapposed leaflets. Surgical replacement was uneventful, and the patient was discharged on day 30, despite a challenging postoperative course. His follow-up at 1 year has been uneventful. This case illustrates that overdilatation of the stent is not recommended because it might worsen central aortic insufficiency. Moreover, the transapical route should be considered when the appropriately sized prosthesis is unable to be inserted because of inappropriate vascular access. However, despite an initial "prohibitive" surgical risk, surgical aortic valvular replacement after percutaneous valve implantation could be easily performed. Conclusion: Percutaneous heart valve implantation, which provides a larger surface area than balloon valvotomy, can be offered to patients with cardiogenic shock and severe comorbidities to improve their hemodynamic state and reduce their surgical risk.
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/52349116132
U2 - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.070
DO - 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2007.12.070
M3 - Article
C2 - 18805274
AN - SCOPUS:52349116132
SN - 0022-5223
VL - 136
SP - 697
EP - 701
JO - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
JF - Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery
IS - 3
ER -