Abstract
This article describes the operative technique of autologous fascial pubovaginal sling (AFPVS) surgery, examines the senior author's outcomes with AFPVS, compares these outcomes with those of other large studies and meta-analyses, and compares the safety and efficacy of AFPVS with those of the synthetic midurethral sling (SMUS). Recently, the SMUS has become the treatment of choice for most surgeons. The efficacy of the SMUS remains unchallenged and comparable with that of AFPVS, but SMUS are associated with more severe complications. In the author's opinion, the AFPVS should remain the gold standard for treating SUI.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 41-52 |
| Number of pages | 12 |
| Journal | Urologic Clinics of North America |
| Volume | 46 |
| Issue number | 1 |
| DOIs | |
| State | Published - Feb 2019 |
Keywords
- Autologous pubovaginal sling
- Efficacy
- Fascial sling
- Operative technique
- Pubovaginal sling
- Safety
- Stress urinary incontinence
- Synthetic midurethral sling
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Surgery for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Autologous Fascial Sling'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Author
- BIBTEX
- Harvard
- Standard
- RIS
- Vancouver