TY - JOUR
T1 - Surgeon-specific factors have a larger impact on decision-making for the management of proximal humerus fractures than patient-specific factors
T2 - a prospective cohort study
AU - Gupta, Ranjan
AU - Jung, James
AU - Johnston, Tyler R.
AU - Wright, David J.
AU - Uong, Jennifer
AU - Lim, Philip K.
AU - Shafiq, Babar
AU - Navarro, Ronald A.
N1 - Publisher Copyright:
© 2023 The Author(s)
PY - 2023/8
Y1 - 2023/8
N2 - Background: There is significant variability both in how proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are treated and the ensuing patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate which surgeon- and patient-specific factors contribute to decision-making in the treatment of adult PHFs. We hypothesized that orthopedic sub-specialty training creates inherent bias and plays an important role in management algorithms for PHFs. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort investigation in 2 groups of surgeons—traumatologists (N = 25) and shoulder & elbow/sports surgeons (SES) (N = 26)—and asked them to provide treatment recommendations for 30 distinct clinical cases with standardized radiographic and clinical data. This is a population-based sample of surgeons who take trauma call and treat PHFs with different sub-specializations and practice settings including academic, hospital-employed, and private. Surgeons characterized based on subspecialty (trauma vs. SES), experience level (>10 vs. ≤10-years), and employment type (hospital- vs. non-hospital-employed). Chi-square analyses, logistic mixed-effects modeling, and relative importance analysis were used to evaluate the data. Results: Of the patient-specific factors, we found that the management of PHFs is largely dependent on initial radiographs obtained. Traumatologists were more likely to offer open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and less likely to offer arthroplasty: 69% ORIF (traumatologists) vs. 51% ORIF (SES, P < .001), 8% arthroplasty (traumatologists) vs. 17% (SES, P < .001). Traumatologists were less likely to change from operative (either ORIF or arthroplasty) to non-operative management compared to SES surgeons when presented with additional patient demographic data. Surgeon-specific factors contributed to more than one-half of the variability in decision-making of PHF management while patient-specific factors contributed to about one-third of the variability in decision-making. Conclusions: As physicians strive to advance the treatment for PHFs and optimize patient outcomes, our findings highlight the complex overlap between surgeon-, fracture-, and patient-specific factors in the final decision-making process.
AB - Background: There is significant variability both in how proximal humerus fractures (PHFs) are treated and the ensuing patient outcomes. The purpose of this study was to investigate which surgeon- and patient-specific factors contribute to decision-making in the treatment of adult PHFs. We hypothesized that orthopedic sub-specialty training creates inherent bias and plays an important role in management algorithms for PHFs. Methods: We performed a prospective cohort investigation in 2 groups of surgeons—traumatologists (N = 25) and shoulder & elbow/sports surgeons (SES) (N = 26)—and asked them to provide treatment recommendations for 30 distinct clinical cases with standardized radiographic and clinical data. This is a population-based sample of surgeons who take trauma call and treat PHFs with different sub-specializations and practice settings including academic, hospital-employed, and private. Surgeons characterized based on subspecialty (trauma vs. SES), experience level (>10 vs. ≤10-years), and employment type (hospital- vs. non-hospital-employed). Chi-square analyses, logistic mixed-effects modeling, and relative importance analysis were used to evaluate the data. Results: Of the patient-specific factors, we found that the management of PHFs is largely dependent on initial radiographs obtained. Traumatologists were more likely to offer open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) and less likely to offer arthroplasty: 69% ORIF (traumatologists) vs. 51% ORIF (SES, P < .001), 8% arthroplasty (traumatologists) vs. 17% (SES, P < .001). Traumatologists were less likely to change from operative (either ORIF or arthroplasty) to non-operative management compared to SES surgeons when presented with additional patient demographic data. Surgeon-specific factors contributed to more than one-half of the variability in decision-making of PHF management while patient-specific factors contributed to about one-third of the variability in decision-making. Conclusions: As physicians strive to advance the treatment for PHFs and optimize patient outcomes, our findings highlight the complex overlap between surgeon-, fracture-, and patient-specific factors in the final decision-making process.
KW - arthroplasty
KW - decision-making
KW - internal fixation
KW - management algorithms
KW - patient-specific factors
KW - Process Measure = Surgical Decision Making
KW - Prospective Cohort Design
KW - Proximal humerus fractures (PHFs)
KW - Quality Improvement Study
KW - surgeon-specific factors
UR - https://www.scopus.com/pages/publications/85151444818
U2 - 10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.016
DO - 10.1016/j.jse.2022.12.016
M3 - Article
C2 - 36690172
AN - SCOPUS:85151444818
SN - 1058-2746
VL - 32
SP - 1701
EP - 1709
JO - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
JF - Journal of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery
IS - 8
ER -