Supporting Shared Decisions When Clinical Evidence Is Low

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

66 Scopus citations

Abstract

There is growing interest in shared decision making (SDM) in the United States and globally, at both the clinical and policy levels. SDM is typically employed during “preference-sensitive” decisions, where there is equipoise between treatment options with equal or similar outcomes from a medical standpoint. In these situations, patients’ preferences for the possible risks, benefits, and trade-offs between options are central to the decision. However, SDM also may be appropriate in clinical situations besides those in which data demonstrate equipoise. In situations of low evidence, where evidence is conflicting, unavailable or not applicable to an individual patient, supporting SDM can present unique challenges, above and beyond the challenges faced during more standard preference-sensitive decisions. This article discusses challenges in supporting shared decisions when clinical evidence is low, describes strategies that can facilitate SDM despite low evidence, and suggests avenues for future research to explore further these proposed strategies.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)113S-128S
JournalMedical Care Research and Review
Volume70
Issue number1_suppl
DOIs
StatePublished - Feb 2013

Keywords

  • patient–clinician communication
  • shared decision making
  • uncertainty

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Supporting Shared Decisions When Clinical Evidence Is Low'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this