Abstract
The study was a controlled, comparative clinical effectiveness trial of two supplementary feeding regimlens in children at risk of malnutrition from seven centres in rural Malawi. Being at risk of malnutrition was defined as weight-for-height <85%, but >80% of the international standard. A stepped-wedge design with systematic allocation was used for assigning children to receive either ready-to-use therapeutic food (RUTF) (n=331) or micronutrient-fortified corn/soy-blend (n=41) for up to eight weeks. The primary outcomes were recovery, defined as weight-for-height >90%, and the rate of weight gain. Children receiving RUTF were more likely to recover (58% vs 22%; difference 36%; 95% confidence interval [CI] 2052) and had greater rates of weight gain (3.1 g/kg.d vs 1.4 g/kg.d; difference 1.7; 95% CI 0.8-2.6) than children receiving corn/soy-blend. The results of this preliminary work suggest that supplementary feeding with RUTF promotes better growth in children at risk of malnutrition than the standard fortified cereal/legume-blended food.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 351-357 |
| Number of pages | 7 |
| Journal | Journal of Health, Population and Nutrition |
| Volume | 23 |
| Issue number | 4 |
| State | Published - Dec 2005 |
Keywords
- Child growth
- Child nutrition
- Child nutrition disorders
- Comparative studies
- Food fortified
- Food supplementation
- Infant food
- Infant growth
- Infant nutrition
- Infant nutrition disorders
- Malawi
- Risk factors